Anonymous wrote:It isn't more oppressive than men being expected to shave every day. By the way, shaving exfoliates, resulting in more even skin tone for men than women.
Men are also expected to get frequent, flattering haircuts and work out expectations aren't less than they are for women.
Anonymous wrote:It isn't more oppressive than men being expected to shave every day. By the way, shaving exfoliates, resulting in more even skin tone for men than women.
Men are also expected to get frequent, flattering haircuts and work out expectations aren't less than they are for women.
Anonymous wrote:It isn't more oppressive than men being expected to shave every day. By the way, shaving exfoliates, resulting in more even skin tone for men than women.
Men are also expected to get frequent, flattering haircuts and work out expectations aren't less than they are for women.
Anonymous wrote:PP, good on you for realizing how much time, effort and money you are pouring into your appearance. I am one of the PPs above -- anti-panty rebel, sometimes makeup and heels wearer -- I hope you can just say no to some of these items and free yourself!
Personally, being a mom, the economics alone have made me say no to manis and pedis (I only ever had them occasionally); no to expensive makeup (Try garnier bb cream from CVS -- it covers all the basses and is amazing for those with medium to "deep" skin, as I think the color is called). The other thing that makes me stop with the mindless consumption is thinking about the landfill waste from all these products, not to mention toxic things in them. Why dont we want our young children to wear makeup, but we will coat our lips with mercury stain?
I do think some amount of upkeep and investment in beauty can go a long way -- makeup on some days and teeth whitening (which I dont do, but I would if whitening toothpaste didn't do the trick).
I also have said no by the way to fast fashion -- just think about the poor women and children slaving away in Bangladesh and Malaysia making those trendy clothes that go for $4. I have been guilty of shopping at the H&Ms and the Gaps and the Zaras, but it is the opposite of elegance or beauty to wear fashion that literally enslaves people. I am challenging myself to wear more vintage/used clothes, and just to consume less in general.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know if I would use the "oppression," but, yes. I think the societal pressures on women with regards to fashion, weight, and makeup represent an undue burden that men don't have. Imagine if we could keep all the time and money we are spending on lotions, creams, magazines, spin classes, plastic surgery, lipsticks, teeth whitening, high heels, and pantyhose for ourselves! Imagine if pre-teen girls weren't already thinking that their thighs were gross and dreaming of the day when they're old enough to get a boob job. Imagine if a woman were judged on her merits and not on how closely she adheres to society's preconceived notions of what she should look like. Beauty standards are like a prison that we all elect to live in.
Just my opinion. Wax on.
Anonymous wrote:Probably so, OP. I remember when I was a teen, and used to think the best example was "cover up." Just says it right there, cover up the real you!
(and then get zits and blackheads and start that whole product cycle...the rat race of skin beauty. I remember reading an article, years ago, where Lauren Hutton (model) spent three months in the desert wearing nothing and said her skin never looked better)
Anyways I agree, but the high heels situation is the thing that irks me the most, probably because it both hinders women's mobility and ruins their feet (so mobility and health). I wear them sometimes but not the crazy height that is in nowadays. I live in LA and yesterday was watching three women in amazingly high shoes totter around a CVS; it was ridiculous. It's ridiculous watching these women try and WALK. That being said, the shoes were pretty.

Anonymous wrote:I thought this was going to be about the heat.