Anonymous wrote:I'm not understanding why people need to be cryptic and unnecessarily difficult.
"I am X (blind, in a wheelchair, etc.) and need accommodations Y. Does your building have that?"
What is so difficult about that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Accessible" is shorthand for "complaint with ADA standards".
I guess this is the best answer. It's an umbrella term.
It just seems that more specific, the better.
But, oh well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know that the person was handicapped, my first thought would be whether it was accessible via public transport.
Right, but when you answered "yes, we are on the Red Line, two blocks from the Silver Spring station," the person would probably follow up with "I mean ADA accessible", and you would answer accordingly.
I have actually found that there is so much confusion about what constitutes accessible under the ADA that I am better to ask about specific elements: do you have an elevator, do you have ASL interpreters or captioning available, etc.
Even if someone asked me, "Is it ADA-accessible?" I do not know the legal ins and outs of what exactly ADA mandates, so I would not know.
You're probably not the right person to ask then!
Oh don't be ridiculous. NP here. It's quite possible to not know the nitty gritty rules yet also be accommodating & willing to find out the info the person needs. For instance, if I worked in a store and someone called asking how wide our door was. I do not need to know the ADA rule in order to be a helpful person and go measure the door for her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know that the person was handicapped, my first thought would be whether it was accessible via public transport.
Right, but when you answered "yes, we are on the Red Line, two blocks from the Silver Spring station," the person would probably follow up with "I mean ADA accessible", and you would answer accordingly.
I have actually found that there is so much confusion about what constitutes accessible under the ADA that I am better to ask about specific elements: do you have an elevator, do you have ASL interpreters or captioning available, etc.
Even if someone asked me, "Is it ADA-accessible?" I do not know the legal ins and outs of what exactly ADA mandates, so I would not know.
You're probably not the right person to ask then!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know that the person was handicapped, my first thought would be whether it was accessible via public transport.
Right, but when you answered "yes, we are on the Red Line, two blocks from the Silver Spring station," the person would probably follow up with "I mean ADA accessible", and you would answer accordingly.
I have actually found that there is so much confusion about what constitutes accessible under the ADA that I am better to ask about specific elements: do you have an elevator, do you have ASL interpreters or captioning available, etc.
Even if someone asked me, "Is it ADA-accessible?" I do not know the legal ins and outs of what exactly ADA mandates, so I would not know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know that the person was handicapped, my first thought would be whether it was accessible via public transport.
Right, but when you answered "yes, we are on the Red Line, two blocks from the Silver Spring station," the person would probably follow up with "I mean ADA accessible", and you would answer accordingly.
I have actually found that there is so much confusion about what constitutes accessible under the ADA that I am better to ask about specific elements: do you have an elevator, do you have ASL interpreters or captioning available, etc.
Even if someone asked me, "Is it ADA-accessible?" I do not know the legal ins and outs of what exactly ADA mandates, so I would not know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know that the person was handicapped, my first thought would be whether it was accessible via public transport.
Right, but when you answered "yes, we are on the Red Line, two blocks from the Silver Spring station," the person would probably follow up with "I mean ADA accessible", and you would answer accordingly.
I have actually found that there is so much confusion about what constitutes accessible under the ADA that I am better to ask about specific elements: do you have an elevator, do you have ASL interpreters or captioning available, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know that the person was handicapped, my first thought would be whether it was accessible via public transport.
So? If someone you haven't met in person says to you
"Is it accessible?"
and you say
"Yes, it's near Farragut North station?"
It's not really that hard to clarify. Why should a word that works well be modified?
I will say that usually, if I am talking to someone I've never met and there are accessibility issues, I would probably say "I want to make sure that we are inclusive of our members with disabilities, is the space accessible?" or something. I can't imagine that the OP is constantly finding themselves in positions where someone is asking "Is it accessible?" out of the blue. If they are, then they probably should have mastered the word by now?
Anonymous wrote:If I didn't know that the person was handicapped, my first thought would be whether it was accessible via public transport.