Anonymous wrote:This is kind of an odd question for this area. At my employer the average age of a FTM is 38 years old (verified fact - they tell us this at orientation). The people having kids at younger ages, especially younger than say 31-32 stick out in the DC metro area. Therefore, there are lots of resources for advanced-maternal age support. It is incredibly common. 44 is definitely on the high side, and most of my friends above 42 having their first are IVF. About half having their second above 42 are IVF. Of course this is just anecdotal. I had mine at 37 and 39.
Anonymous wrote:Pregnant now w/my 2nd. I am 39. Had my first at 36. I am a LOT more tired now than I was even 3 years ago. Can't tell if its because Im tired from chasing a 3 year old around or because it is just harder being a pregnant 39 year old than a pregnant 36 year old.
Regardless, I also have many friends in my age group pregnant/with small children.
Anonymous wrote:The problem with these threads is self selection. The women who want you to believe they had easy conceptions and pregnancies will chime in, while the more typical women who had great difficulty conceiving, multiple failed rounds of in vitro, tried donor eggs only to have miscarriages before one finally took, and then suffered through a rough pregnancy will be silent.
Anonymous wrote:2 kids in early 40s. No difficulties, no problems.
Clearly, it is a problem for a significant number of people , but it's also not a problem for a significant number of people.
Anonymous wrote:The current birth rate for women in their 40s is the highest is has been since, wait for it, before birth control was widely available. It is not a freak of nature to have a healthy pregnancy in your 40s.
I had my first at 40 (got pregnant at 39) and second at 43 (two months before turning 44). Both perfectly healthy, amazing and thriving girls.
The only downside is that if my girls wait as long as I did, I will be a really old grandma.