Anonymous wrote:Not sure how you keep score. In my book raping a minor is a pretty big deal.

is it a bigger deal than defending a child rapist, and assassinating the child's character in the process?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, OP. There is nothing in this article that is “news.” These allegations have been out there for a while.
The MSM is really going after Trump. It won’t matter.

Hillary has no records to run on so they are attacking Trump personally. People who know Trump have all said he is a kind, generous and loyal person.

With the exception of the woman alleging that Trump raped her when she was a minor? And Ivana?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Except when he sexually assualted women...I guess that's not a pervert anymore

Sigh. Which has never been proven. Seriously. The Republicans have no leg to stand on. Unless you're looking for covert action in the men's room, in which case, you are covered.

Didn't Bill Clinton pay Paula Jones 800 thousand dollars? Why would he do that if he is innocent? It's not just one or two women, it's, what, seven, eight or more?

Really? People who settle lawsuits are all guilty? Then Trump is guilty hundreds of times over.

No, there are lots of reasons to settle. Sometimes it is just not worth the time and misery of pursuing things all the way to trial and judgment. It had gone on for years.

+100. He was playing with policy limits and a insurer potentially on the hook for defense costs for another appeal and remand to the district court for further proceedings. While I'm quite confident Clinton ultimately would have prevailed on some pretty specious claims pushed by a scummy law firm he was looking at upwards of another million in attorneys' fees alone. The case would have consumed his presidency.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Yeah, everyone uses cigars to do what he did.

She was an adult.

a naive one

but an adult

A consenting one too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Yeah, everyone uses cigars to do what he did.

She was an adult.

a naive one

but an adult

This election makes me sad for our country. 2 deeply flawed candidates. A lot of pot and kettle

But I'm pretty sure trump is truly certifiable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Except when he sexually assualted women...I guess that's not a pervert anymore

Sigh. Which has never been proven. Seriously. The Republicans have no leg to stand on. Unless you're looking for covert action in the men's room, in which case, you are covered.

Didn't Bill Clinton pay Paula Jones 800 thousand dollars? Why would he do that if he is innocent? It's not just one or two women, it's, what, seven, eight or more?

He was caught lying during a deposition which would busted it wide op. Their lawyers were able to settle with Jones for $750,000k . There are so many scandals with the Clintons, nothing compared to Trump except what's been made up. Worst they can say, he's on his 3rd wife and has yellow hair.

^^Someone has not been paying attention. ^^

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Except when he sexually assualted women...I guess that's not a pervert anymore

Sigh. Which has never been proven. Seriously. The Republicans have no leg to stand on. Unless you're looking for covert action in the men's room, in which case, you are covered.

Didn't Bill Clinton pay Paula Jones 800 thousand dollars? Why would he do that if he is innocent? It's not just one or two women, it's, what, seven, eight or more?

He was caught lying during a deposition which would busted it wide op. Their lawyers were able to settle with Jones for $750,000k . There are so many scandals with the Clintons, nothing compared to Trump except what's been made up. Worst they can say, he's on his 3rd wife and has yellow hair.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

He's not running for POTUS -- Trump is.

It's 1992 in their addled little minds. Or a woman can't be a legitimate candidate, therefore Hill's husband is running for a third term. Neither option is great.

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

He's not running for POTUS -- Trump is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Except when he sexually assualted women...I guess that's not a pervert anymore

Sigh. Which has never been proven. Seriously. The Republicans have no leg to stand on. Unless you're looking for covert action in the men's room, in which case, you are covered.

Didn't Bill Clinton pay Paula Jones 800 thousand dollars? Why would he do that if he is innocent? It's not just one or two women, it's, what, seven, eight or more?

Really? People who settle lawsuits are all guilty? Then Trump is guilty hundreds of times over.

No, there are lots of reasons to settle. Sometimes it is just not worth the time and misery of pursuing things all the way to trial and judgment. It had gone on for years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Except when he sexually assualted women...I guess that's not a pervert anymore

Sigh. Which has never been proven. Seriously. The Republicans have no leg to stand on. Unless you're looking for covert action in the men's room, in which case, you are covered.

Didn't Bill Clinton pay Paula Jones 800 thousand dollars? Why would he do that if he is innocent? It's not just one or two women, it's, what, seven, eight or more?

I think the Cosby case changed things. People have lost tolerance fo so much 'smoke' and I'm guessing finding the Clintons disparaging the women who accused him as trailer trash less charming and woman friendly.

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, OP. There is nothing in this article that is “news.” These allegations have been out there for a while.
The MSM is really going after Trump. It won’t matter.

Hillary has no records to run on so they are attacking Trump personally. People who know Trump have all said he is a kind, generous and loyal person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no where near the misogynist pervert that little Billy Clinton is.

Bill Clinton was a philanderer, but pervert he was not. He never gave interview of his daughter's breast size, body shape or fantasizing dating the daughter. Please!

In any case, you have to wake up - this is 2016 - It is not the same Clinton we are talking about.

Except when he sexually assualted women...I guess that's not a pervert anymore

Sigh. Which has never been proven. Seriously. The Republicans have no leg to stand on. Unless you're looking for covert action in the men's room, in which case, you are covered.

Forget the Republicans. Many women have come forward. It's interesting that their experiences are mocked and devalued here, yet so many DCUM posters view themselves as very liberal in their thinking re rape, women's rights, abortion, etc.

Um, the special prosecutor investigated them and declined to press charges.

I'm well aware. Charges aren't pressed in many cases and situations, yet most DCUM posters believe the women.