Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree. If you want to do more add it into the class teacher's gift. This is what I do so there is not an air of impropriety.
Why is it "proper" to give more as part of a group gift, but not as an individual gift?
The implication is what somehow if a gift is attributed, a teacher would do something different for the child. That's not possible when the gift occurs at the end of the year. And, most teachers are perfectly capable of accepting a gift without it affecting the way the treat children in the classroom.
I give generously to my kids' teachers, and save the most generous gifts for the end of the year precisely so teachers don't feel like I'm trying to influence how they treat my kids. It's a pure gesture of appreciation.
Of course I'm not going to treat a child differently because of a gift. But an extravagant gift (and yes, for a teacher $200 is an extravagant gift) feels like a tip you give to your hired help. It feels icky.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree. If you want to do more add it into the class teacher's gift. This is what I do so there is not an air of impropriety.
Why is it "proper" to give more as part of a group gift, but not as an individual gift?
The implication is what somehow if a gift is attributed, a teacher would do something different for the child. That's not possible when the gift occurs at the end of the year. And, most teachers are perfectly capable of accepting a gift without it affecting the way the treat children in the classroom.
I give generously to my kids' teachers, and save the most generous gifts for the end of the year precisely so teachers don't feel like I'm trying to influence how they treat my kids. It's a pure gesture of appreciation.
Yet you have kids -- plural. Ever had the same teacher twice? Do you think teachers talk and know who is extravagant with gifts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree. If you want to do more add it into the class teacher's gift. This is what I do so there is not an air of impropriety.
Why is it "proper" to give more as part of a group gift, but not as an individual gift?
The implication is what somehow if a gift is attributed, a teacher would do something different for the child. That's not possible when the gift occurs at the end of the year. And, most teachers are perfectly capable of accepting a gift without it affecting the way the treat children in the classroom.
I give generously to my kids' teachers, and save the most generous gifts for the end of the year precisely so teachers don't feel like I'm trying to influence how they treat my kids. It's a pure gesture of appreciation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree. If you want to do more add it into the class teacher's gift. This is what I do so there is not an air of impropriety.
Why is it "proper" to give more as part of a group gift, but not as an individual gift?
The implication is what somehow if a gift is attributed, a teacher would do something different for the child. That's not possible when the gift occurs at the end of the year. And, most teachers are perfectly capable of accepting a gift without it affecting the way the treat children in the classroom.
I give generously to my kids' teachers, and save the most generous gifts for the end of the year precisely so teachers don't feel like I'm trying to influence how they treat my kids. It's a pure gesture of appreciation.
Anonymous wrote:Agree. If you want to do more add it into the class teacher's gift. This is what I do so there is not an air of impropriety.
Anonymous wrote:St Patrick's does. You are told to donate to room parent who then gives a group gift.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no one is giving 200 that is a troll. This kind of gift the teacher's would get in trouble.
That's just plain stupid. WHy would the teachers get in trouble for the generosity of parents?
Our DCs' teachers had no issues with thr gifts. Sounds like you're petty and jealous that some parents can afford to give more generously.
No most schools do not allow expensive gifts as there can be the optics that teachers will treat said child differently. Same thing in the government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no one is giving 200 that is a troll. This kind of gift the teacher's would get in trouble.
That's just plain stupid. WHy would the teachers get in trouble for the generosity of parents?
Our DCs' teachers had no issues with thr gifts. Sounds like you're petty and jealous that some parents can afford to give more generously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no one is giving 200 that is a troll. This kind of gift the teacher's would get in trouble.
That's just plain stupid. WHy would the teachers get in trouble for the generosity of parents?
Our DCs' teachers had no issues with thr gifts. Sounds like you're petty and jealous that some parents can afford to give more generously.
Gauche.