Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 20 millionth time picking up a child in car in a car with MD or Virginia tags is not definitive proof of anything. Maybe we should have a law that says only custodial parents can pick up their children.
In individual cases, this may be true. But a large number of MD cars, for example, picking up and dropping off, suggests that there is some amount of residency fraud going on. It's interesting, for example, that schools where you would expect to see high levels of nannies picking up children in their own vehicles (e.g., Janney, Mann) actually have relatively low anecdotal numbers of MD plated vehicles dropping or retrieving students. Other schools, particularly those who draw their students from around the city (where it may be easier for a fraudster to fly below the radar because the school-neighborhood identity isn't as strong) have higher numbers of out of state cars.
84% of kids at Mann are in-bounds. At Amidon, it's 82%. Not a huge difference.
Anonymous wrote:Good god, there is a week of school left. Give it a rest.
Anonymous wrote:My sister's child attends school in DC. She and her husband have joint custody. Dad lives in DC, and mom lives in MD, however both have MD tags. I wonder what would happen if the "tag police" spent more time investing in their own children, and less trying to police other families.
Anonymous wrote:I have DC tags and attend an MD school right over the border. It's not because I cheat; it's because I moved in the fall and never changed them. So sue me for being lazy but not for cheating on schools.
My neighbor regularly has her child dropped off in cars with DC plates: one is her FATHER and the other is her GRANDMOTHER.
My child's best friend is dropped off and picked up in a car with MD plates: it's a nanny.
Chill out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 20 millionth time picking up a child in car in a car with MD or Virginia tags is not definitive proof of anything. Maybe we should have a law that says only custodial parents can pick up their children.
In individual cases, this may be true. But a large number of MD cars, for example, picking up and dropping off, suggests that there is some amount of residency fraud going on. It's interesting, for example, that schools where you would expect to see high levels of nannies picking up children in their own vehicles (e.g., Janney, Mann) actually have relatively low anecdotal numbers of MD plated vehicles dropping or retrieving students. Other schools, particularly those who draw their students from around the city (where it may be easier for a fraudster to fly below the radar because the school-neighborhood identity isn't as strong) have higher numbers of out of state cars.
Anonymous wrote:For the 20 millionth time picking up a child in car in a car with MD or Virginia tags is not definitive proof of anything. Maybe we should have a law that says only custodial parents can pick up their children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sister's child attends school in DC. She and her husband have joint custody. Dad lives in DC, and mom lives in MD, however both have MD tags. I wonder what would happen if the "tag police" spent more time investing in their own children, and less trying to police other families.
The tag police is one anorexic mom with a three year old, who wants amidon bowen to have less brown children.
Or a troll pretending to be the same. Either way, is there a point in letting her continue?
Trust me, the tag policewoman wouldn't send her kid to that cesspool in a hundred years. But having to pay for non-residents to go there sucks too bad. It's about wasting public money on non-residents, which you self-important fools cannot comprehend.
Wow who else can you manage to offend with a single post?
Evidently just you, PP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sister's child attends school in DC. She and her husband have joint custody. Dad lives in DC, and mom lives in MD, however both have MD tags. I wonder what would happen if the "tag police" spent more time investing in their own children, and less trying to police other families.
The tag police is one anorexic mom with a three year old, who wants amidon bowen to have less brown children.
Or a troll pretending to be the same. Either way, is there a point in letting her continue?
Trust me, the tag policewoman wouldn't send her kid to that cesspool in a hundred years. But having to pay for non-residents to go there sucks too bad. It's about wasting public money on non-residents, which you self-important fools cannot comprehend.
Wow who else can you manage to offend with a single post?