Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.
Except for this year and last.
You can always move
Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.
Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why.....
It's NOT the Ferguson effect, as the White House and the NYT tell us every time the FBI dares to point out the obvious.
Must be the drought in California. Or the Zika virus.
Facts matter.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/preliminary-semiannual-uniform-crime-report-januaryjune-2015/tables/table-3
Don't you need to go pick up your spiffy white robe and pointy hat from the cleaners?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.
Except for this year and last.
You can always move
Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.
Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why.....
It's NOT the Ferguson effect, as the White House and the NYT tell us every time the FBI dares to point out the obvious.
Must be the drought in California. Or the Zika virus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?
Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.
Snapchat doesn't hep either.
But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.
Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require.
There's an old saying: If you don't do the crime, you won't do the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?
Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.
Snapchat doesn't hep either.
But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.
Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require.
There's an old saying: If you don't do the crime, you won't do the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?
Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.
Snapchat doesn't hep either.
But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.
Sorry if their civil rights are preventing you from delivering the beatings you think black people require.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?
Twitter. It's all about Twitter now.
Snapchat doesn't hep either.
But the BLM "movement"? Those are nice, nice folks, who really care about public safety.
Anonymous wrote:Are video games still a potential suspect for increasing violence or have we moved past that already?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.
Except for this year and last.
You can always move
Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.
Hmmm, why would that be....why, why, why.....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And DC has that extra special problem of having federal prosecutors who are not accountable to DC citizens, and these prosecutors keep dropping the ball and keep putting violent criminals back out on the street.
As between the federal prosecutors and the elected attorney general and elected city council, it seems to me that it's the elected officials who are pro-crime.
The voters in this city are simply uninterested in getting tough on crime. The advocacy and political influence on behalf of criminals far outweighs that on behalf of victims.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Violent crime is actually on a decades long decline. Media loves to sensationalize and that leads to the perception that it is growing.
Except for this year and last.
You can always move
Are you so out of touch with reality? Violent crime, in the last couple years, has increased through out the country, not just the DC area.
Anonymous wrote:i can't imagine why anyone would be on the street at 17th and I at 2 in the morning on Saturday.
Anonymous wrote:i can't imagine why anyone would be on the street at 17th and I at 2 in the morning on Saturday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And DC has that extra special problem of having federal prosecutors who are not accountable to DC citizens, and these prosecutors keep dropping the ball and keep putting violent criminals back out on the street.
As between the federal prosecutors and the elected attorney general and elected city council, it seems to me that it's the elected officials who are pro-crime.
The voters in this city are simply uninterested in getting tough on crime. The advocacy and political influence on behalf of criminals far outweighs that on behalf of victims.
Anonymous wrote:And DC has that extra special problem of having federal prosecutors who are not accountable to DC citizens, and these prosecutors keep dropping the ball and keep putting violent criminals back out on the street.