Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For a high school with 500 students. 500 students.
They might as well expand the scope of Ellington to 6th grade and make it a magnet arts middle + high school for the entire city.
that's a great idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why the Ellington project got no oversight in planning or ongoing implementation, in comparison to elementary school projects that cost beans in comparison and get cut every step of the way.
Well the auditor report explains why -- this is part 2 of 2 separate reports.
And part of the reason the later projects are getting more scrutiny is because DGS and DCPS are doing more oversight now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For a high school with 500 students. 500 students.
They might as well expand the scope of Ellington to 6th grade and make it a magnet arts middle + high school for the entire city.
Anonymous wrote:..."Much of the cost overruns - $60M - can be attributed to the underground parking."
Anonymous wrote:For a high school with 500 students. 500 students.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why the Ellington project got no oversight in planning or ongoing implementation, in comparison to elementary school projects that cost beans in comparison and get cut every step of the way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems very little blame placed at the school - which doesn't surprise me. I think they are victims too.
Victims of a buttload of cash and a glorious palace of a modernization?
Well come and "victimize" my school too.
My point was the Ellington community wasn't the ones who mismanaged this or created the design any more than the students and administrators at Shepherd, Murch or any other school.
Not true. Someone at the Ellington community/ school must have been moving influences in the back stage for this epic disaster to continue.
Anonymous wrote:Have you driven by lately? It's bizarre. The place is still an empty shell and there never seem to be workers there...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems very little blame placed at the school - which doesn't surprise me. I think they are victims too.
Victims of a buttload of cash and a glorious palace of a modernization?
Well come and "victimize" my school too.
My point was the Ellington community wasn't the ones who mismanaged this or created the design any more than the students and administrators at Shepherd, Murch or any other school.
So no one on the Ellington board of directors had the political pull to squeeze this through. Well, then it must have just been some honest gosh darned mistakes that led us here. Nope, nothing to see.
I'd be willing to to believe it, but where does it say in the auditor's report that that's what happened here? I didn't see that finding. Did you?
The report doesn't say 2 + 2 = 4.
Now, is it, or is it not?
Anonymous wrote:This is on the mayor and the council. They're all culpable in this one.
And we wonder why we're fighting over scraps for the rest of our schools.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the OP (although I'm only the OP because I saw the report and put it here first)
I think the DC Auditors office deserves praise for doing their job and not burying this under a rug, where I'm sure the Council and Administration would like it to go.
What kills me is this: It also states that students who attend the historic performing arts school have schedules atypical of most DCPS students. Consequently, significant amounts of space will go unused for extended periods of time once the building's upgrades are complete. Therefore, the auditor is also suggesting that DCPS increase the school's enrollment or open up its grounds to other educational programs.