Anonymous wrote:There are several problems with subsidized housing in Arlington.
For starters, the County adopted a plan that wants to have almost 20% of Arlington's housing stock be subsidized.
That is an enormous expense. When you subtract the school budget, the County spends ~10% of its discretionary non-school income on subsidizing housing. That is money away from core services like police, firemen, parks and rec, and other services.
On top of that people living in subsidized housing also represent an ongoing and continuous drain on county resources. So it is not just the one time expense of reaching ~20% subsidized housing in Arlington. It is the permanent and ongoing costs associated with maintaining those.
Those long term costs, as well as the up front costs, are never given clearly to Arlington voters. Instead we get sops about how subsidized housing is needed so that our teachers, police, and firefighters can live in our areas. None of that is true - and in fact many of these same people are getting displaced from current housing stock to move in people with lower income. On top of that, subsidized housing can't be targeted by profession, so the claim that this is to help County public servants is silly
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question
Why do we need affordable housing at all
It just creates artificial floors, screws the middle class who make just over the income cutoff. People don't have right to live anywhere
Is this some liberal white guilt thing?
It may have started as a liberal white thing, but in order to obtain Federal government subsidies for many programs, the Feds are requiring that a certain percentage of housing in areas be affordable. No affordable housing, no government tit.
I'm all for AH. I just want it to be mixed income, so that we're not economically segregating people or sheltering one area of the county from having AH.
Is your concern that individual buildings be mixed income, or the distribution of AH among neighborhoods?
If the former, than you should applaud things like inclusionary zoning. The all AH buildings would be problematic - but they do deliver a lot of units relatively cheaply. Not sure how easy it would be to get that many units in mixed income buildings.
If its neighborhoods, well it has hard to get these buildings in SFH zoned areas. More ADU's would help. The County could buy land in places like the RB corridor for AH, but that would be expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question
Why do we need affordable housing at all
It just creates artificial floors, screws the middle class who make just over the income cutoff. People don't have right to live anywhere
Is this some liberal white guilt thing?
It may have started as a liberal white thing, but in order to obtain Federal government subsidies for many programs, the Feds are requiring that a certain percentage of housing in areas be affordable. No affordable housing, no government tit.
I'm all for AH. I just want it to be mixed income, so that we're not economically segregating people or sheltering one area of the county from having AH.
Anonymous wrote:I also tend to think thatcArlington should have something better than a Podunk-ish hospital.
Anonymous wrote:VHC is a fantastic hospital
Anonymous wrote:I also tend to think thatcArlington should have something better than a Podunk-ish hospital.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:that is the problem, poor people will always bring poor people problems such as under performance at school. The problem with Arlington is there simply isn't that many schools and only couple of good ones which become targets by the have-nots who have enough votes to push changes through the county gov. There will always be upper class SFHs in N Arlington, the question is does it become like Alexandria which wasn't able to protect it's schools and now has a "private school culture" or do they hold on as long as possible and keep their legacy HHI segregation policies that effect the schools. They could also do what MoCo is doing and double down on special programs and magnets for the upper middle class to stash their kids in to keep them separated.
Or the population can accept that urban and rich, white enclaves can't really exist together without oppressive policies that are basically unfair. These policies pick winners and the results are losers who are typically the people often propped up to be the losers for must of the American grind.
This is one of the most honest and eloquent things I have read on here.
Anonymous wrote:that is the problem, poor people will always bring poor people problems such as under performance at school. The problem with Arlington is there simply isn't that many schools and only couple of good ones which become targets by the have-nots who have enough votes to push changes through the county gov. There will always be upper class SFHs in N Arlington, the question is does it become like Alexandria which wasn't able to protect it's schools and now has a "private school culture" or do they hold on as long as possible and keep their legacy HHI segregation policies that effect the schools. They could also do what MoCo is doing and double down on special programs and magnets for the upper middle class to stash their kids in to keep them separated.
Or the population can accept that urban and rich, white enclaves can't really exist together without oppressive policies that are basically unfair. These policies pick winners and the results are losers who are typically the people often propped up to be the losers for must of the American grind.
Anonymous wrote:There are several problems with subsidized housing in Arlington.
For starters, the County adopted a plan that wants to have almost 20% of Arlington's housing stock be subsidized.
That is an enormous expense. When you subtract the school budget, the County spends ~10% of its discretionary non-school income on subsidizing housing. That is money away from core services like police, firemen, parks and rec, and other services.
On top of that people living in subsidized housing also represent an ongoing and continuous drain on county resources. So it is not just the one time expense of reaching ~20% subsidized housing in Arlington. It is the permanent and ongoing costs associated with maintaining those.
Those long term costs, as well as the up front costs, are never given clearly to Arlington voters. Instead we get sops about how subsidized housing is needed so that our teachers, police, and firefighters can live in our areas. None of that is true - and in fact many of these same people are getting displaced from current housing stock to move in people with lower income. On top of that, subsidized housing can't be targeted by profession, so the claim that this is to help County public servants is silly
Anonymous wrote:I'm totally against affordable housing. No one has a right to live where ever they want. If Arlington isn't affordable, then poor or middle income families will need to move somewhere else that is more affordable.