Anonymous wrote:If it's a costume at party city, then it's not a commonly accepted racial slur.
The word gypsy isn't used exclusively to refer to the Roma. It has many commonly accepted uses in the English language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who told you that it was? Gypsy comes from a mistake about the origins of the Roma/Sinti/travelers and it offensive to many, but I've never seen anyone claim it is *exactly* like the n-word. Both are slurs. One has a more robust history of terror in the United States.
Word.
Just look at murder stats by race/ ethnicity of accused.
I do not see many Roma there.
We don't really have a population on Roma here either.
DC has a nice Roma population. They own some businesses in Adams Morgan and, I'm sorry to say, they beg in the suburbs.
In most European countries they beg all over the place. Imagine outside EVERY Safeway (even the most remote ones you don't even understand how they got there), every CVS etc. Here, I am yet to see one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe not in North America. But in Europe it is definitely on the same level as the N word is here. And frankly, who are you to decide what's more offensive to respective minority?
this exactly.
So tired of others helpfully dictating to me the ranking order of offensiveness. If you are the son of two sharecroppers, by definition you have no experience with being the son of 4 grandparents who were made to walk the Trail of Tears at gunpoint. Stuff it
Anonymous wrote:Maybe not in North America. But in Europe it is definitely on the same level as the N word is here. And frankly, who are you to decide what's more offensive to respective minority?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who told you that it was? Gypsy comes from a mistake about the origins of the Roma/Sinti/travelers and it offensive to many, but I've never seen anyone claim it is *exactly* like the n-word. Both are slurs. One has a more robust history of terror in the United States.
Word.
Just look at murder stats by race/ ethnicity of accused.
I do not see many Roma there.
We don't really have a population on Roma here either.
DC has a nice Roma population. They own some businesses in Adams Morgan and, I'm sorry to say, they beg in the suburbs.
....at the corner of Democracy and Old Georgetown Rd!
Anonymous wrote:There is actually a TV show in England called "my Big Fat Gypsy Wedding" -- and that is a highly regulated tv market -- so no, nowhere remotely close to the "n" word, even in Europe. (And England does have gypsies/travelers who face discrimination etc)
That said, Michelle Obama said "gypped" a while back -- that's been considered offensive for a while now.
Anonymous wrote:Is it such a reach to say that a group that was sent to concentration camps has been victimized?
I don't understand why you need to rate suffering. It's a slur. Call them Roma.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who told you that it was? Gypsy comes from a mistake about the origins of the Roma/Sinti/travelers and it offensive to many, but I've never seen anyone claim it is *exactly* like the n-word. Both are slurs. One has a more robust history of terror in the United States.
Word.
Just look at murder stats by race/ ethnicity of accused.
I do not see many Roma there.
We don't really have a population on Roma here either.
DC has a nice Roma population. They own some businesses in Adams Morgan and, I'm sorry to say, they beg in the suburbs.