Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, if we all believed we should only do what nature allows naturally, without scientific intervention, none of us would be on this board.
The fact science makes it possible doesn't mean one should do it.
That's pretty hypocritical. Especially coming from this particular forum.
how so? can you explain?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:a bit of a culture clash here. So many above looking at it from the standpoint of the baby.
Really, that's not what this was about. See the post above that said :
"They had the baby because her husband's father's estate is worth close to $1mil and his siblings are refusing to give him any of the inheritance since he never had children. They had the baby to be able to get his share of the inheritance;''
That's how things are in India.
It said he fought his family for his inheritance, won, and THEN used that money to pay for IVF.
huh? It says "they had the baby to be able to get his share of the inheritance."
Anonymous wrote:Might be donor sperm as well. A 79 year old man probably makes very low quality sperm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:a bit of a culture clash here. So many above looking at it from the standpoint of the baby.
Really, that's not what this was about. See the post above that said :
"They had the baby because her husband's father's estate is worth close to $1mil and his siblings are refusing to give him any of the inheritance since he never had children. They had the baby to be able to get his share of the inheritance>''
That's how things are in India.
It said he fought his family for his inheritance, won, and THEN used that money to pay for IVF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:a bit of a culture clash here. So many above looking at it from the standpoint of the baby.
Really, that's not what this was about. See the post above that said :
"They had the baby because her husband's father's estate is worth close to $1mil and his siblings are refusing to give him any of the inheritance since he never had children. They had the baby to be able to get his share of the inheritance;''
That's how things are in India.
It said he fought his family for his inheritance, won, and THEN used that money to pay for IVF.
Anonymous wrote:a bit of a culture clash here. So many above looking at it from the standpoint of the baby.
Really, that's not what this was about. See the post above that said :
"They had the baby because her husband's father's estate is worth close to $1mil and his siblings are refusing to give him any of the inheritance since he never had children. They had the baby to be able to get his share of the inheritance>''
That's how things are in India.
Anonymous wrote:Also, if we all believed we should only do what nature allows naturally, without scientific intervention, none of us would be on this board.
Anonymous wrote:Wonder if she's breastfeeding...
Anonymous wrote:Old men have kids all the time and no one bitches about it.
Super sexist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, if we all believed we should only do what nature allows naturally, without scientific intervention, none of us would be on this board.
The fact science makes it possible doesn't mean one should do it.
That's pretty hypocritical. Especially coming from this particular forum.