Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How real are these projected numbers? I know FCPS can be wildly wrong when predicting short-term and long-term numbers. Is APS really going to have that many additional high school students in just a couple years?
If those are real, reliable numbers, then just build the fourth high school. Expensive, yes, but needed.
Where?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How real are these projected numbers? I know FCPS can be wildly wrong when predicting short-term and long-term numbers. Is APS really going to have that many additional high school students in just a couple years?
If those are real, reliable numbers, then just build the fourth high school. Expensive, yes, but needed.
Where?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How real are these projected numbers? I know FCPS can be wildly wrong when predicting short-term and long-term numbers. Is APS really going to have that many additional high school students in just a couple years?
If those are real, reliable numbers, then just build the fourth high school. Expensive, yes, but needed.
Where?
Anonymous wrote:How real are these projected numbers? I know FCPS can be wildly wrong when predicting short-term and long-term numbers. Is APS really going to have that many additional high school students in just a couple years?
If those are real, reliable numbers, then just build the fourth high school. Expensive, yes, but needed.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds awful to me. We moved to Arlington for the more personal touch, not so our kids could attend high school factories with 2600-3000 students. The plans for Arlington Tech also make no sense. Is it supposed to be like TJ or is it just a plan to segregate kids on the non-college track?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They should not build any actual buildings for schools. They need to start buying and re purposing office building space. There is enough office space vacancy that is not going to be filled by businesses that could be used.
There are lots of vacant office buldings. Would buying/leasing one and retrofitting it be more cost-effective than buying the land and building? If so, then they should get started right away on that.
Anonymous wrote:They should not build any actual buildings for schools. They need to start buying and re purposing office building space. There is enough office space vacancy that is not going to be filled by businesses that could be used.
Anonymous wrote:I agree 10:26. I think it's especially bad for people who have kids in ES right now. There are a lot of kids in ES and these steps won't get close to addressing the problem. I think spending so much putting ANOTHER ES in N. Arlington is crazy when they HS problem is going to be so much worse!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds awful to me. We moved to Arlington for the more personal touch, not so our kids could attend high school factories with 2600-3000 students. The plans for Arlington Tech also make no sense. Is it supposed to be like TJ or is it just a plan to segregate kids on the non-college track?
Arlington Tech is not supposed to be a TJ. Appears to be both vocational and college prep, though no AP or IB will be offered.
Hmm. Sign me up (not).
I think blurring the line between vocational and college prep makes sense, but I can't imagine a college-bound student who's going to be OK with no AP classes. Is that really the plan?
Yes, that really is the plan, according to the website. They propose that Arlington Tech students can get college credit through dual enrollment, presummably with NOVA, or through CTE classes.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds awful to me. We moved to Arlington for the more personal touch, not so our kids could attend high school factories with 2600-3000 students. The plans for Arlington Tech also make no sense. Is it supposed to be like TJ or is it just a plan to segregate kids on the non-college track?