Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess... you're zoned for Eaton and got zoned out of Deal?
You clearly don't care about MacFarland, so why should I care what you think would be awesome?
Nope, I've got zero dog in this fight. I get no benefit either way. I just think DCPS's "build it and they will come" plan is a stupid one that's doomed to failure and a waste of money. I do want MacFarland to succeed because I'm watching DCPS dump a bunch of money down a bottomless hole right now.
What's your bias? Shepherd Park resident who needs to claim rights over Deal?
It is remarkable that someone with no dog in the fight would have such a strong and immovable opinion, not only that MacFarland should be improved, and not only that schools should be cut from Deal to achieve that, but also regarding the specific schools that should be removed from Deal and fed to MacFarland instead. The specificity of your viewpoint is as remarkable as the forcefulness with which you express it. Usually people with no dog in the fight are a bit more philosophical, open to different ideas......
ope, I've got zero dog in this fight. I get no benefit either way. I just think DCPS's "build it and they will come" plan is a stupid one that's doomed to failure and a waste of money. I do want MacFarland to succeed because I'm watching DCPS dump a bunch of money down a bottomless hole right now.
What's your bias? Shepherd Park resident who needs to claim rights over Deal?
It is remarkable that someone with no dog in the fight would have such a strong and immovable opinion, not only that MacFarland should be improved, and not only that schools should be cut from Deal to achieve that, but also regarding the specific schools that should be removed from Deal and fed to MacFarland instead. The specificity of your viewpoint is as remarkable as the forcefulness with which you express it. Usually people with no dog in the fight are a bit more philosophical, open to different ideas......
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let me guess... you're zoned for Eaton and got zoned out of Deal?
You clearly don't care about MacFarland, so why should I care what you think would be awesome?
Nope, I've got zero dog in this fight. I get no benefit either way. I just think DCPS's "build it and they will come" plan is a stupid one that's doomed to failure and a waste of money. I do want MacFarland to succeed because I'm watching DCPS dump a bunch of money down a bottomless hole right now.
What's your bias? Shepherd Park resident who needs to claim rights over Deal?
Anonymous wrote:Let me guess... you're zoned for Eaton and got zoned out of Deal?
You clearly don't care about MacFarland, so why should I care what you think would be awesome?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 50 kids that go to Deal each year from Shepherd (45 of which are OOB) are not going to build a middle school.
Don't let your fear about your Deal pipeline rob you of courage. Think about others in your community. 50 from Shepherd + 50 from Bancroft + 50 from Powell = lots of potential.
Besides, if 90% of Shepherd's students are OOB as you are claiming, why do you care? Sounds like this won't really matter to Shepherd Park residents. And if Shepherd Elementary is so powerful that it can boost the proficiency of all those OOB students, then it will do wonders for MacFarland! This is your chance to prove how great Shepherd Park and Shepherd Elementary really are!
Let me guess... you're zoned for Eaton and got zoned out of Deal?
You clearly don't care about MacFarland, so why should I care what you think would be awesome?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are the schools that would be cut out of MacFarland under this plan?
Why would you feed Shepherd there and not Whittier, Brightwood or Takoma - all of which are closer.
They could all feed there. It would be the Alice Deal for that entire area. They key is that I'm crediting Shepherd Bancroft and Powell with being strong feeder schools based on their reputations. They are the ones that will ensure MacFarland has a good base to start, and isn't treated as a school of last resort. Those neighborhoods have strong spirit and bragging rights to activism and diversity, so I think they have the strength to pull it off. The question is whether they have the courage to do it.
Anonymous wrote:But that all goes over your heads because *gasp* there will be many poors there. For those of us who can get past that, maybe there will be something to the school. And maybe not, but I'm willing to hang around and see instead of poo pooing it because of the "awfulness" of the feeders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 50 kids that go to Deal each year from Shepherd (45 of which are OOB) are not going to build a middle school.
Don't let your fear about your Deal pipeline rob you of courage. Think about others in your community. 50 from Shepherd + 50 from Bancroft + 50 from Powell = lots of potential.
Besides, if 90% of Shepherd's students are OOB as you are claiming, why do you care? Sounds like this won't really matter to Shepherd Park residents. And if Shepherd Elementary is so powerful that it can boost the proficiency of all those OOB students, then it will do wonders for MacFarland! This is your chance to prove how great Shepherd Park and Shepherd Elementary really are!
Anonymous wrote:The 50 kids that go to Deal each year from Shepherd (45 of which are OOB) are not going to build a middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are the schools that would be cut out of MacFarland under this plan?
Why would you feed Shepherd there and not Whittier, Brightwood or Takoma - all of which are closer.
They could all feed there. It would be the Alice Deal for that entire area. They key is that I'm crediting Shepherd Bancroft and Powell with being strong feeder schools based on their reputations. They are the ones that will ensure MacFarland has a good base to start, and isn't treated as a school of last resort. Those neighborhoods have strong spirit and bragging rights to activism and diversity, so I think they have the strength to pull it off. The question is whether they have the courage to do it.
Ain't gonna happen. No matter how much you want the Brown folk out of Deal. Sorry. Leave to deal with colored folks. You do live in DC you know.
Quit trying to make everything about race. Try focusing on building a school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS is already planning a 'North Middle.'
And how can DCPS allow a majority white Deal.
DC is going to be majority white in another 10 years. AA are alread below 50% now.
Anonymous wrote:DCPS is already planning a 'North Middle.'
And how can DCPS allow a majority white Deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are the schools that would be cut out of MacFarland under this plan?
Why would you feed Shepherd there and not Whittier, Brightwood or Takoma - all of which are closer.
They could all feed there. It would be the Alice Deal for that entire area. They key is that I'm crediting Shepherd Bancroft and Powell with being strong feeder schools based on their reputations. They are the ones that will ensure MacFarland has a good base to start, and isn't treated as a school of last resort. Those neighborhoods have strong spirit and bragging rights to activism and diversity, so I think they have the strength to pull it off. The question is whether they have the courage to do it.
Ain't gonna happen. No matter how much you want the Brown folk out of Deal. Sorry. Leave to deal with colored folks. You do live in DC you know.