Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel 50% for work, much of which is international. An assignment came up that would require travel to a place that was not the safest local, especially as a woman traveling alone. My boss brought it up and mentioned that he wouldn't recommend I take it, I agreed, and I was very appreciative that I didn't have to ask for a travel exemption.
Truth is there are still many places in the world that are unsafe to travel as a woman alone. Trust me, your boss was doing you a favor.
It was Eastern Europe, not the Sudan.
I'm the OP you're quoting. Have you ever been to Eastern Europe? I have many times. It's not as safe as you seem to think that it is.
Get off of your feminist high-horse and get pragmatic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You should have said to him right when he made the comment "Thank you for considering my safety, but as an adult, I am confident in my ability to make my own decisions about my safety."
+1 million.
And follow up in writing: "Dear Larlo, following up on your explanation for why I was not sent to Latvia, (my husband would not allow it) I would like to memorialize that I am available for all foreign travel regardless of destination and that my spouse plays no role in my decision making or availability. I look forward to being given the very next complex travel assignment of my choosing." And cc: HR and his boss.
OP, this is clearly discrimination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel 50% for work, much of which is international. An assignment came up that would require travel to a place that was not the safest local, especially as a woman traveling alone. My boss brought it up and mentioned that he wouldn't recommend I take it, I agreed, and I was very appreciative that I didn't have to ask for a travel exemption.
Truth is there are still many places in the world that are unsafe to travel as a woman alone. Trust me, your boss was doing you a favor.
It was Eastern Europe, not the Sudan.
Also, PPs boss brought it up and gave PP the option and some say in the matter. Huge difference between that and a boss unilaterally deciding on a woman's behalf that she can't go due to her gender.
Sorry, no. The boss determines who gets what assignments. That's why he's the boss. He made a stupid joke, yes, but it sounds like she was't going to get it anyway regardless of gender. He was looking for an excuse. It's crummy, yes, but it's still his prerogative.
Nope, bosses do NOT have prerogative to make discriminatory decisions based on gender. Not how it works. The only reason he gave OP was her gender. Seriously, what is the matter with you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel 50% for work, much of which is international. An assignment came up that would require travel to a place that was not the safest local, especially as a woman traveling alone. My boss brought it up and mentioned that he wouldn't recommend I take it, I agreed, and I was very appreciative that I didn't have to ask for a travel exemption.
Truth is there are still many places in the world that are unsafe to travel as a woman alone. Trust me, your boss was doing you a favor.
It was Eastern Europe, not the Sudan.
Also, PPs boss brought it up and gave PP the option and some say in the matter. Huge difference between that and a boss unilaterally deciding on a woman's behalf that she can't go due to her gender.
Sorry, no. The boss determines who gets what assignments. That's why he's the boss. He made a stupid joke, yes, but it sounds like she was't going to get it anyway regardless of gender. He was looking for an excuse. It's crummy, yes, but it's still his prerogative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel 50% for work, much of which is international. An assignment came up that would require travel to a place that was not the safest local, especially as a woman traveling alone. My boss brought it up and mentioned that he wouldn't recommend I take it, I agreed, and I was very appreciative that I didn't have to ask for a travel exemption.
Truth is there are still many places in the world that are unsafe to travel as a woman alone. Trust me, your boss was doing you a favor.
It was Eastern Europe, not the Sudan.
Also, PPs boss brought it up and gave PP the option and some say in the matter. Huge difference between that and a boss unilaterally deciding on a woman's behalf that she can't go due to her gender.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel 50% for work, much of which is international. An assignment came up that would require travel to a place that was not the safest local, especially as a woman traveling alone. My boss brought it up and mentioned that he wouldn't recommend I take it, I agreed, and I was very appreciative that I didn't have to ask for a travel exemption.
Truth is there are still many places in the world that are unsafe to travel as a woman alone. Trust me, your boss was doing you a favor.
It was Eastern Europe, not the Sudan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I travel 50% for work, much of which is international. An assignment came up that would require travel to a place that was not the safest local, especially as a woman traveling alone. My boss brought it up and mentioned that he wouldn't recommend I take it, I agreed, and I was very appreciative that I didn't have to ask for a travel exemption.
Truth is there are still many places in the world that are unsafe to travel as a woman alone. Trust me, your boss was doing you a favor.
It was Eastern Europe, not the Sudan.
Anonymous wrote:I travel 50% for work, much of which is international. An assignment came up that would require travel to a place that was not the safest local, especially as a woman traveling alone. My boss brought it up and mentioned that he wouldn't recommend I take it, I agreed, and I was very appreciative that I didn't have to ask for a travel exemption.
Truth is there are still many places in the world that are unsafe to travel as a woman alone. Trust me, your boss was doing you a favor.