Anonymous wrote:Thanks you guys. I really do understand both sides of this. Maybe MIL just doesn't want our dog there anymore, even though she's been fine with it in the past., and that's her prerogative. But she really did handle it wrong with some really hurtful words to DH.
DH and his mom have a good relationship but it's also a typical first child v. mother relationship. He can be stubborn and hard headed and she can be demanding and lay on the guilt trip like no other. Clearly this argument is no different.
I'm just feeling so sad about not going over this. I know great grandma really wants to see the baby, and his cousins were so excited to see him too. That family togetherness makes me really happy, and now i'm feeling so sad that we're not going to have it this weekend. Maybe this is post baby hormones, but I used to not feel so strongly about this stuff and now I do!
Anonymous wrote:
The original request was not to bring the dog. Etiquette requires that this wish be complied with. No host should have to suffer canine guests he or she doesn't want, whatever the reason!
Dog-owners should know that part of the costs incurred with their pet is boarding during your travel, and that their dog should be socialized enough to be compliant in these situations.
Also, just because your dog was welcomed at your MIL's and behaved well there in the past does not mean that she is obliged to welcome your pet every time you visit!
The argument and unfortunate words that followed should be ignored, because it stems from your husband's rude behavior of disputing the dog issue, which he was not supposed to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So MIL is concerned that your dog, who lives with your son, is going to attack your son, which he has presumably not done before?
My guess is that she thinks that our dog and her dog are going to attack each other and our son (who is newly crawling) is going to get in the middle of it. It's completely irrational because (1) my dog is completely sweet to our son, (2) our dog and their dog have growled at each other but have never attacked one another, (3) in the 5 years our dogs have been together at their house we have always been aware that the dogs aren't bffs and make sure we pay attention to what they're doing at all times, (4) we have brought our son and our dog to their house 3 times already and she never mentioned that she didn't want our dog there.
No matter what the reason, my feeling is that family is more important than the dogs (although our dog is like a child to us!) and why are we cancelling this trip over the dogs?!? Clearly this fight is more than just about the dogs.
If the dogs and have done things that make you aware they aren't BFF's, then MIL is right to think that they might not get along and maybe shouldn't be together. The baby is newly crawling so something that seemed ok before might not seem ok now. I agree that the whole thing seems like a lot of paranoia, but I could see the thought process.
Or, maybe MIL just doesn't want your dog and came up with an excuse that backfired.
But here's the thing. It's her house. She said no dog. Don't bring the dog. Your husband is completely wrong to dig in his heels and say if you can't bring the dog they can't see the baby. That is actually so immature and wrong that I'd have a very hard time with it.
Anonymous wrote:Don't buy into MIL's argument. She doesn't want a second dog at her house, period (along with human guests). But she needs to be honest about the reason rather than pegging it to a safety concern which she thought she could use to shut you down (sort of a shaming technique). Don't take your dog to her house. She does not want it there. But DH needs to make her admit her reasoning because what she's now done is make you guys feel like your somehow bad parents and that's not fair.