Anonymous wrote:
Well, the law pretty much lets employers do what they want. They can dump your application if you don't answer and can fire you if you lied and got hired.
Anonymous wrote:
Bottom line, if you can get away with not divulging it, great. But most larger employers or HR teams say they MUST have it to know how to price you.
Anonymous wrote:Why do employers ask for current salary?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not just tell the candidate what salary you're offering and let them self-select out if it's too low? The candidate's worth should be based on market value, not what they're currently making. Basing future pay on current earnings lets you low-ball candidates and perpetuates race and gender based wage inequality.
But candidates are motivated by different things when they need a job. Today they will agree to make less but tomorrow, when I, a recruiter calls to pitch them something more in line maybe to where they were at before a job they took with less salary - well then you lose them. As the employer, you have to know upfront if something makes sense - it's just good business. I just can't let the candidate dictate whether they want to take $10-15k less unless there's a tangible explanation for why it makes sense. That's why knowing current salary is also so important. And really, candidates need to understand like pop said - you are being considered for an opportunity - it's a good thing for you - why do you want to be difficult and not tell me what you make? If I don't make you a fair offer just walk. Budget plays a big role in job offers - you sound like people are out to give as little as possible to new hires if they can but the really good co the ones you want to work with will be fair and they want a happy exployee to start - please try to remember that.
Well yeah, if the employer refuses to tell the candidate their budget for the role but expects the candidate to disclose their current salary, I am going to think they're out to give as little as possible to new hires.
The candidate is taking time off work to come to the interview(s), plus the time they spend researching and preparing. So yeah, they can just walk if the offer isn't fair, but their time (and possibly money) has already been wasted.
If the employer won't share the range in the early interviewing stage then I definitely think the candidate should walk. That's a bad company. And I do agree candidates need to disclose their current salary. And if you are underpaid for the market, do not apologize. You state I currently make 50k and my salary requirements are 75k.
Anonymous wrote:if you are below range, it could be an indicator of poor performance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not just tell the candidate what salary you're offering and let them self-select out if it's too low? The candidate's worth should be based on market value, not what they're currently making. Basing future pay on current earnings lets you low-ball candidates and perpetuates race and gender based wage inequality.
But candidates are motivated by different things when they need a job. Today they will agree to make less but tomorrow, when I, a recruiter calls to pitch them something more in line maybe to where they were at before a job they took with less salary - well then you lose them. As the employer, you have to know upfront if something makes sense - it's just good business. I just can't let the candidate dictate whether they want to take $10-15k less unless there's a tangible explanation for why it makes sense. That's why knowing current salary is also so important. And really, candidates need to understand like pop said - you are being considered for an opportunity - it's a good thing for you - why do you want to be difficult and not tell me what you make? If I don't make you a fair offer just walk. Budget plays a big role in job offers - you sound like people are out to give as little as possible to new hires if they can but the really good co the ones you want to work with will be fair and they want a happy exployee to start - please try to remember that.
Well yeah, if the employer refuses to tell the candidate their budget for the role but expects the candidate to disclose their current salary, I am going to think they're out to give as little as possible to new hires.
The candidate is taking time off work to come to the interview(s), plus the time they spend researching and preparing. So yeah, they can just walk if the offer isn't fair, but their time (and possibly money) has already been wasted.
Anonymous wrote:Corporate recruiter here - we ask because we have to reference a salary point to know if it makes sense for budget of role to consider you. If you make over my budgeted salary range there's no sense in continuing the conversation is there? I also need to get an idea of your experience in market - on a deeper level if the recruiter is highly experienced - your salary allows me to figure out if you developed your career track well. There's a lot of people who do weird things - I get a sense for how well you've managed your decisions and why you opt for the positions you have - it provides me Intel on your professional acumen. Usually not a big deal unless you are more C level though. You have to tell your recruiter - I categorically will not work within uncooperative candidate. It's interview 101 that you let me know where you are in comp. it does not mean I'm gonna low ball you - it's totally relevant info for an employer. Some people get way too weird about it thinking they can negotiate on the back end but nobody wants to waste their time. I get if you work directly with a small biz owner but I'm talking about corporate F500 co.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not just tell the candidate what salary you're offering and let them self-select out if it's too low? The candidate's worth should be based on market value, not what they're currently making. Basing future pay on current earnings lets you low-ball candidates and perpetuates race and gender based wage inequality.
But candidates are motivated by different things when they need a job. Today they will agree to make less but tomorrow, when I, a recruiter calls to pitch them something more in line maybe to where they were at before a job they took with less salary - well then you lose them. As the employer, you have to know upfront if something makes sense - it's just good business. I just can't let the candidate dictate whether they want to take $10-15k less unless there's a tangible explanation for why it makes sense. That's why knowing current salary is also so important. And really, candidates need to understand like pop said - you are being considered for an opportunity - it's a good thing for you - why do you want to be difficult and not tell me what you make? If I don't make you a fair offer just walk. Budget plays a big role in job offers - you sound like people are out to give as little as possible to new hires if they can but the really good co the ones you want to work with will be fair and they want a happy exployee to start - please try to remember that.
Anonymous wrote:Why not just tell the candidate what salary you're offering and let them self-select out if it's too low? The candidate's worth should be based on market value, not what they're currently making. Basing future pay on current earnings lets you low-ball candidates and perpetuates race and gender based wage inequality.
Anonymous wrote:Why not just tell the candidate what salary you're offering and let them self-select out if it's too low? The candidate's worth should be based on market value, not what they're currently making. Basing future pay on current earnings lets you low-ball candidates and perpetuates race and gender based wage inequality.