Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My current boss plays favorites hard. When I first joined the team, she hated me. After a few months, I became the favorite. For the last year, the favorite is someone else and I'm not back to being hated but definitely no longer adored.
When I was the favorite, I knew it wasn't a fair dynamic to the rest of the team and that I didn't deserve it but I was just so glad to no longer be hated that I just went with it. Now that someone else is the favorite, I can appreciate just how much it sucks for the non-favorites on the team.
Why are so many women terrible managers?
OMG...I had that exact same boss...it was terrible. It was like being in an abusive relationship. You never knew if she was going to love you or hate you an any given day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My current boss plays favorites hard. When I first joined the team, she hated me. After a few months, I became the favorite. For the last year, the favorite is someone else and I'm not back to being hated but definitely no longer adored.
When I was the favorite, I knew it wasn't a fair dynamic to the rest of the team and that I didn't deserve it but I was just so glad to no longer be hated that I just went with it. Now that someone else is the favorite, I can appreciate just how much it sucks for the non-favorites on the team.
Why are so many women terrible managers?
Anonymous wrote:My current boss plays favorites hard. When I first joined the team, she hated me. After a few months, I became the favorite. For the last year, the favorite is someone else and I'm not back to being hated but definitely no longer adored.
When I was the favorite, I knew it wasn't a fair dynamic to the rest of the team and that I didn't deserve it but I was just so glad to no longer be hated that I just went with it. Now that someone else is the favorite, I can appreciate just how much it sucks for the non-favorites on the team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work at a large financial company that only hires Indian H1Bs for Unix admins. Indians only hire other Indians. The bias is embedded in the culture.
Suppose there was a large, U.S. government-operated program that permitted U.S. employers to hire nothing but White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) college-graduate men between the ages of 22 and 30.
The sad truth is, if you change a few words, that is exactly what the H-1B program permits; but instead of WASP males, the favored population is male Indian college graduates, perhaps largely from the south and west of India (and certainly not men from other parts of Colonial India, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar (Burma), and very, very few women from the Subcontinent).
http://cis.org/north/h-1b-program-facilitates-blatant-racial-discrimination
Company ---------------------- Percent Indian
Cognizant Tech Solutions ---- 99.6%
Infosys ------------------------- 98.1%
Tata Consultancy Services --- 99.7%
OP here. I think what you are talking about is something different than favoritism and probably more appropriate for another thread. You are talking about race in hiring practices, not necessarily a situation where a manager has a favorite based on personal relationship and gives that person advantages that other employees don't get.
I'm not necessarily saying that the issue you raise isn't an issue or isn't worth a discussion, but I think it's different than the topic of the thread.
Anonymous wrote:I work at a large financial company that only hires Indian H1Bs for Unix admins. Indians only hire other Indians. The bias is embedded in the culture.
Suppose there was a large, U.S. government-operated program that permitted U.S. employers to hire nothing but White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) college-graduate men between the ages of 22 and 30.
The sad truth is, if you change a few words, that is exactly what the H-1B program permits; but instead of WASP males, the favored population is male Indian college graduates, perhaps largely from the south and west of India (and certainly not men from other parts of Colonial India, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar (Burma), and very, very few women from the Subcontinent).
http://cis.org/north/h-1b-program-facilitates-blatant-racial-discrimination
Company ---------------------- Percent Indian
Cognizant Tech Solutions ---- 99.6%
Infosys ------------------------- 98.1%
Tata Consultancy Services --- 99.7%
Anonymous wrote:I'm interested in hearing stories where people have encountered unmerited favoritism in the workplace, situations where one employee clearly is favored by a manager, even though that employee doesn't necessarily contribute more or go above and beyond. I'm interested in hearing how this impacted the office as a whole and if/how it was ever mitigated.
TIA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Federal agency. Slightly attractive women get special treatment.
This is something I've heard about. I would go even further, though, and say that slightly attractive women who indulge flirting get special treatment. I know someone who was in a situation where she could've gotten special treatment. She was attractive, but she shut down the flirting, and it impacted her in a negative way. Another person didn't shut it down, and that person definitely got special treatment (as in certain male managers fell all over themselves to help her career).
This is one area that I think is tricky for women. And you would think it's just an issue for women who aren't conventionally attractive (as in they get slighted), but it's also an issue for women who are average or above average attractive but don't like a certain kind of attention from male superiors and send a clear message that it is unwelcome.
I don't really see how to change it. It's a difficult thing to prove. And most often, the attention skirts the edge of harassment. So it doesn't rise to the level of making any kind of official complaint. It's more subtle than that. At least that's the situation the person I know confronted.
I think that the sad reality is that managers -- of both sexes -- tend to treat more favorably the people who make them feel good. So even some female managers will advance and promote the people who tend to flatter them the most or make them feel liked.
I'd love to hear some positive stories about how someone effectively dealt with this sort of thing and was able to strike a balance.
I'm in a federal agency and when I was younger I was treated borderline EEO badly. I could have filed but wanted to keep my job. I've now waited those sucker out. I'm in a position of authority.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Federal agency. Slightly attractive women get special treatment.
This is something I've heard about. I would go even further, though, and say that slightly attractive women who indulge flirting get special treatment. I know someone who was in a situation where she could've gotten special treatment. She was attractive, but she shut down the flirting, and it impacted her in a negative way. Another person didn't shut it down, and that person definitely got special treatment (as in certain male managers fell all over themselves to help her career).
This is one area that I think is tricky for women. And you would think it's just an issue for women who aren't conventionally attractive (as in they get slighted), but it's also an issue for women who are average or above average attractive but don't like a certain kind of attention from male superiors and send a clear message that it is unwelcome.
I don't really see how to change it. It's a difficult thing to prove. And most often, the attention skirts the edge of harassment. So it doesn't rise to the level of making any kind of official complaint. It's more subtle than that. At least that's the situation the person I know confronted.
I think that the sad reality is that managers -- of both sexes -- tend to treat more favorably the people who make them feel good. So even some female managers will advance and promote the people who tend to flatter them the most or make them feel liked.
I'd love to hear some positive stories about how someone effectively dealt with this sort of thing and was able to strike a balance.
Anonymous wrote:Some of the worst environments for favoritism are huge old companies and organizations. I've read that a ridiculously high percentage of generals/admirals are blood relatives of former generals/admirals. And I work for a big company (not a family company by any means) where the same is true about company executives.
Anonymous wrote:Federal agency. Slightly attractive women get special treatment.