Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No, I don't think so. Colleges use it all the time.
Colleges are different from public school districts.
Anonymous wrote:This was in the comment section:
Teacher2015
8:19 PM EDT [Edited]
Since MCPS is all about hiring consultants and ordering studies to address the academic gap let's try another novel approach. Forget assuming race is the potent sinister variable in this disparity of
meeting the acceptance guidelines.
Instead let's just look at the commonalities that academically achieving students have in common.
Two parent families
Adults that are actively engaged with their children and school activities
Adults that monitor what their children are doing in school
Adults that communicate with the teachers and principal
Adults that attend school meetings
Adults that set academic goals for their children
Adults that read to their children on a daily basis
Education is absolutely an endeavor between the teacher, the student and the parents!
I completely agree. This applies to kids of ALL races. This is not something schools can 'fix'.
Anonymous wrote:This was in the comment section:
Teacher2015
8:19 PM EDT [Edited]
Since MCPS is all about hiring consultants and ordering studies to address the academic gap let's try another novel approach. Forget assuming race is the potent sinister variable in this disparity of
meeting the acceptance guidelines.
Instead let's just look at the commonalities that academically achieving students have in common.
Two parent families
Adults that are actively engaged with their children and school activities
Adults that monitor what their children are doing in school
Adults that communicate with the teachers and principal
Adults that attend school meetings
Adults that set academic goals for their children
Adults that read to their children on a daily basis
Education is absolutely an endeavor between the teacher, the student and the parents!
I completely agree. This applies to kids of ALL races. This is not something schools can 'fix'.
Anonymous wrote:
So you think the guy is just making it up about lots of families not knowing the programs exist?
Anonymous wrote:
No, I don't think so. Colleges use it all the time.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/maryland-school-district-examines-racial-disparities-in-its-gifted-programs/2016/03/21/1caacdf6-eb88-11e5-b0fd-073d5930a7b7_story.html
How is it that people don't know about these programs? I got something in the mail and ConnectEd multiple calls / emails.
Anonymous wrote:Is this the study ex-superintendent (what was his name??) initiated before he was let go about a year ago? He felt magnets didn't serve the county students adequately? He wanted a top-down review of magnet programs and identify "potential improvements"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ If they implement, this will be the beginning of the end for the MoCo magnets as we know it.
In what way does broadening the base of applicants spell the end of application-only magnets?
It's not about broadening the base of applicants. The end goal here is to bring race into the selection process.
That's interesting, because what the actual report actually says is that it's about broadening the base of applicants.
Also, it's illegal to bring race into the selection process.
Not if you call it "holistic" admission process.
Yes, it's still illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ If they implement, this will be the beginning of the end for the MoCo magnets as we know it.
In what way does broadening the base of applicants spell the end of application-only magnets?
It's not about broadening the base of applicants. The end goal here is to bring race into the selection process.
That's interesting, because what the actual report actually says is that it's about broadening the base of applicants.
Also, it's illegal to bring race into the selection process.
Not if you call it "holistic" admission process.
Anonymous wrote:This quote is from the article:
“It is outrageous,” said Diego Uriburu, co-chair of the Montgomery County Latino Advocacy Coalition. “There are great inequities in terms of access. The majority of our families don’t even know these programs exist.”
Sorry, I don't buy this. I have a second grader in MCPS. I received TWO phone calls about the Parent Questionnaire and BOTH were translated completely in Spanish.
The questionnaire itself was also translated in Spanish.
If your phone number is in the directory, then you also received this message. We're at a Title 1 School, so I completely understand that some people have more barriers than others, but the above quote is just ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What makes you angry? What makes you feel racist? And why does it make you feel racist?
Makes me angry that they would even remotely consider getting rid of these programs or changing them to admit a less qualified but more racially diverse set of students.
There seems to be an implication that the current system is racist. So if I support the current system I am racist.
There are many reasons these programs are not racially diverse. Nothing will be solved by gutting these programs. Kids that truly need these programs and are thriving in them will be the ones hurt in the process.