Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Terrible choice -- another old moderate white man. Fuck that.
Terrible choice. Typical DC liberal, ex-Brennan clerk. Obama's "I'm so sorry we have such division in Washington" is total bullshit. Most divisive president in my lifetime. "News of Garland’s selection leaked out after Obama held a conference call with Democrats on the Judiciary Committee." Partisan, partisan, partisan.
Thank you, Barack, for Donald Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Terrible choice -- another old moderate white man. Fuck that.
Terrible choice. Typical DC liberal, ex-Brennan clerk. Obama's "I'm so sorry we have such division in Washington" is total bullshit. Most divisive president in my lifetime. "News of Garland’s selection leaked out after Obama held a conference call with Democrats on the Judiciary Committee." Partisan, partisan, partisan.
Thank you, Barack, for Donald Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Terrible choice -- another old moderate white man. Fuck that.
Anonymous wrote:I guess being Jewish and having gone to Harvard is what it takes to get ahead these days.
This may be good news for Trump - just one more indication to his expanding base that Obama/Clinton are completely aligned with the Boston-Washington power elite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my thinking is that, there isn't even a good chance for this pick to be seated so why damage srinivasan or kelly or karlan or watford (or lynch) with the shitshow that the R's will put them through.
No, no. Democrats do "shit-show". (See, eg, Clarence Thomas, Robert Bork.) Republicans do advise and consent. Understand the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my thinking is that, there isn't even a good chance for this pick to be seated so why damage srinivasan or kelly or karlan or watford (or lynch) with the shitshow that the R's will put them through.
No, no. Democrats do "shit-show". (See, eg, Clarence Thomas, Robert Bork.) Republicans do advise and consent. Understand the difference.
Anonymous wrote:my thinking is that, there isn't even a good chance for this pick to be seated so why damage srinivasan or kelly or karlan or watford (or lynch) with the shitshow that the R's will put them through.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any chance this is a "throw away" nomination so Mitch et al can throw a fit and stymie it only to have the real second nomination please stand up?
Very likely - after all, that's how he got John Kerry and Chuck Hagel confirmed, by floating names he knew would make the GOP flip out, then ultimately nominating his real choices once they'd blown their collective wad.