Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hillary has not denounce this story...must be true...Hillary is a support of the KKK.
why not? this is how Trump was treated. I agree, this must be true (as long as it's the California Klan--any other would be illegitimate).
Anonymous wrote:That KKK dude sounds deranged and delusional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine Hillary scooping up both 90% of African American votes and 90% of KKK votes? What a uniter...
[OP, of course your post is utter bullsh!t and you know it. If you don't, please present yourself to your nearest psychiatrist for evaluation.]
Just because you don't/can't/won't believe it doesn't make it any more or less true. Being blinded by ideology isn't a virtue, it's a hindrance to free thought.
Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine Hillary scooping up both 90% of African American votes and 90% of KKK votes? What a uniter...
[OP, of course your post is utter bullsh!t and you know it. If you don't, please present yourself to your nearest psychiatrist for evaluation.]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not one substantiative response.
Oh please! It's a false piece by a UK tabloid. Provide a legitimate source if you expect a legitimate response.
Posted the day before some major primaries. Do you think another campaign is behind it?
No, I think a UK tabloid is behind it. It's a joke. Well, almost a joke. If you actually read the piece, which is hard to do because tears of laughter are falling from my eyes, this guy claims to support HC because David Duke is supporting Trump and he considers Duke to be his enemy. Therefore, he likes HC because the enemy of his enemy is his friend.
Anonymous wrote:Hillary has not denounce this story...must be true...Hillary is a support of the KKK.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not one substantiative response.
Oh please! It's a false piece by a UK tabloid. Provide a legitimate source if you expect a legitimate response.
Posted the day before some major primaries. Do you think another campaign is behind it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not one substantiative response.
Oh please! It's a false piece by a UK tabloid. Provide a legitimate source if you expect a legitimate response.