Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10:50, OP here. Yes, it was HW, even though the school tried to characterized it later as a "HW test". I think that was BS, it was marked as HW on the report card and DD's classmates thought it was HW.
I think the first example they gave in the Madison honor code under Cheating "Copying or allowing others to copy information from someone else's work, test, homework..." covers homework.
What I struggled with the missing element of "allowing". DD did not allow and did not expect someone would copy, and I believe her. She is someone who has no problem in admitting her mistake if there is one. Many views expressed here indicated DD should have known better that by giving out the information, she should have expected someone would copy it. That was the part that I did not consider before, neither was DD.
I need to have a talk with my kids to teach them to be more defensive. It may made them start to distant themselves from their friends and classmates, but if that is what is needed, I will consider it.
11:01, I think what I keep struggling with is whether there need to have "knowledge and/or intent" to "allowing" to occur. If DD's classmate said, can I copy yours and DD showed HW, then that is clearly allowing. If DD said you can see but you cannot copy, then there were no "allowing". What I seem to hear is that many here believe if DD showed it to someone, then the action itself is already a violation of the honor code and is deemed cheating, no knowledge nor intent is needed. I am just struggling to understand the concept.
I hear many here said they were told of this in earlier grades. I obviously did not go to those classes, but I have no reason to doubt it. On the other hand, DD did not know. Was she naive? perhaps. Does she deserve to have her grade destroyed? I have mixed feelings.
If you called someone who was having a party, and said "will you be allowing alcohol?" and they said no, but you later found out that there was alcohol in the house, available to the kids, and they didn't do anything other than say, once, "please don't drink it"? Would you be annoyed?
I would, because I would consider giving someone the tools to do something, when you have no way or intention of stopping them from using those tools the wrong way, to be allowing the behavior.
Anonymous wrote:10:50, OP here. Yes, it was HW, even though the school tried to characterized it later as a "HW test". I think that was BS, it was marked as HW on the report card and DD's classmates thought it was HW.
I think the first example they gave in the Madison honor code under Cheating "Copying or allowing others to copy information from someone else's work, test, homework..." covers homework.
What I struggled with the missing element of "allowing". DD did not allow and did not expect someone would copy, and I believe her. She is someone who has no problem in admitting her mistake if there is one. Many views expressed here indicated DD should have known better that by giving out the information, she should have expected someone would copy it. That was the part that I did not consider before, neither was DD.
I need to have a talk with my kids to teach them to be more defensive. It may made them start to distant themselves from their friends and classmates, but if that is what is needed, I will consider it.
11:01, I think what I keep struggling with is whether there need to have "knowledge and/or intent" to "allowing" to occur. If DD's classmate said, can I copy yours and DD showed HW, then that is clearly allowing. If DD said you can see but you cannot copy, then there were no "allowing". What I seem to hear is that many here believe if DD showed it to someone, then the action itself is already a violation of the honor code and is deemed cheating, no knowledge nor intent is needed. I am just struggling to understand the concept.
I hear many here said they were told of this in earlier grades. I obviously did not go to those classes, but I have no reason to doubt it. On the other hand, DD did not know. Was she naive? perhaps. Does she deserve to have her grade destroyed? I have mixed feelings.
Anonymous wrote:This is about HOMEWORK? My view is that the action the school took is over the top. It is one thing to cheat on a test by copying someone else’s work. But HOMEWORK? The purpose of homework is to gain practice in learning certain skills and concepts. If someone copied your daughter’s homework, the one that loses is the person who copied it.
And, as for the Madison HS honor code - maybe I missed it, but where does it address HOMEWORK?
I would begin by asking the school what the purpose of homework is. Is it graded? If it is, that is interesting because I would wonder how the school knows WHO completed the homework. If the parent helped the student, then who is really getting the grade - the parent or the student? How can the school know, for certain, if the student actually completed the homework independently, thus earning the grade he/she is given.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Sorry for the confusion. No I am not an AP, I was responding to the question of who told me about the rule.
Thanks for the feed backs. I want to hear your opinions and perspectives. Please keep them coming.
I feel that my DD was not defensive enough to protect herself against something like this. But kids are kids and do things without thinking through all the possibilities. DD said she would not have send a copy of HW to her classmate if she knew or could even imagine there is a possibility that her classmate would just copy it. She just wanted the other kid to see how it can be done, learning the concept but not copying. There is absolutely no benefit for DD to help, but she tried to help.
I may be at fault as well if there is such a rule and I have never heard of it. Within the scope of cheating where A and B both intend for one of them to cheat, I can understand. But I am still struggling with the idea that B can be deemed cheating if A secretly copied B. So is there a presumption that if B let A to see the homework, B is deemed to know that A would cheat?
I want to know what is the path forward if that is the case, should I tell my kids to never let another kid see their HW before it is due? This is different from when I was growing up when helping each other to understand the HW and may be work together was a good thing.
If I need to adjust, I think I will. Thanks for feed back.