Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uh, the "Sleeping Beauty" crib is just that--massive suffocation hazard for a baby. The designer should be sued.
what, because they used crib bumpers? dial it back a notch.
I'm not PP, but do you live under a rock? Bumpers are a suffocation hazard whether you like it or not. You can't even buy them in Maryland because they've been banned.
Of course they are. and you can get them in any store for cheap. they are not something only designers/rich people have access to.
Right. No one was talking about whether only designers or rich people have access to them.
The crib bumpers AND the curtains:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/18/health/no-bumpers-cribs-sids-parenting/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145399/Soft-deadly-Parents-warned-crib-accessories-suffocate-babies--stores-continue-sell-them.html
http://www.rch.org.au/kidsinfo/fact_sheets/Choking,_Suffocation_and_Strangulation/
The "designer" needs to face the firing squad.
Ok psycho you do realize it is not a real house. It is a design house. Just calm it down.
Don't design infant death traps. It doesn't matter if it's "real" or not. People copy ideas they see. Apparently, you're not a parent just an asshole.
Photos of interiors are staged by photographers, or the photographer's stagers, to look good and they don't represent a space as it's lived in. You can't even see what's in the crib - is it a pillow? Does the crib have a hard inner surface that lets the ruffles come out on the exterior but not reach the kid? Maybe the parents wanted one fabricated but they have it out at night and for naps...it takes 2 seconds to lift fabric out of a crib. Designers come up with creative and safe solutions, too. Every day. It's called design.
The designer or decorator needs to be sued no more than Amazon.com needs to be sued for selling bumpers and featuring photos of them on their website.
Take a chill pill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uh, the "Sleeping Beauty" crib is just that--massive suffocation hazard for a baby. The designer should be sued.
what, because they used crib bumpers? dial it back a notch.
I'm not PP, but do you live under a rock? Bumpers are a suffocation hazard whether you like it or not. You can't even buy them in Maryland because they've been banned.
Of course they are. and you can get them in any store for cheap. they are not something only designers/rich people have access to.
Right. No one was talking about whether only designers or rich people have access to them.
The crib bumpers AND the curtains:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/18/health/no-bumpers-cribs-sids-parenting/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145399/Soft-deadly-Parents-warned-crib-accessories-suffocate-babies--stores-continue-sell-them.html
http://www.rch.org.au/kidsinfo/fact_sheets/Choking,_Suffocation_and_Strangulation/
The "designer" needs to face the firing squad.
Ok psycho you do realize it is not a real house. It is a design house. Just calm it down.
Don't design infant death traps. It doesn't matter if it's "real" or not. People copy ideas they see. Apparently, you're not a parent just an asshole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uh, the "Sleeping Beauty" crib is just that--massive suffocation hazard for a baby. The designer should be sued.
what, because they used crib bumpers? dial it back a notch.
I'm not PP, but do you live under a rock? Bumpers are a suffocation hazard whether you like it or not. You can't even buy them in Maryland because they've been banned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uh, the "Sleeping Beauty" crib is just that--massive suffocation hazard for a baby. The designer should be sued.
what, because they used crib bumpers? dial it back a notch.
I'm not PP, but do you live under a rock? Bumpers are a suffocation hazard whether you like it or not. You can't even buy them in Maryland because they've been banned.
Of course they are. and you can get them in any store for cheap. they are not something only designers/rich people have access to.
Right. No one was talking about whether only designers or rich people have access to them.
The crib bumpers AND the curtains:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/18/health/no-bumpers-cribs-sids-parenting/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145399/Soft-deadly-Parents-warned-crib-accessories-suffocate-babies--stores-continue-sell-them.html
http://www.rch.org.au/kidsinfo/fact_sheets/Choking,_Suffocation_and_Strangulation/
The "designer" needs to face the firing squad.
Ok psycho you do realize it is not a real house. It is a design house. Just calm it down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uh, the "Sleeping Beauty" crib is just that--massive suffocation hazard for a baby. The designer should be sued.
what, because they used crib bumpers? dial it back a notch.
I'm not PP, but do you live under a rock? Bumpers are a suffocation hazard whether you like it or not. You can't even buy them in Maryland because they've been banned.
Of course they are. and you can get them in any store for cheap. they are not something only designers/rich people have access to.
Right. No one was talking about whether only designers or rich people have access to them.
The crib bumpers AND the curtains:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/18/health/no-bumpers-cribs-sids-parenting/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145399/Soft-deadly-Parents-warned-crib-accessories-suffocate-babies--stores-continue-sell-them.html
http://www.rch.org.au/kidsinfo/fact_sheets/Choking,_Suffocation_and_Strangulation/
The "designer" needs to face the firing squad.