Anonymous wrote:George is awesome, but anyone that ranks him at the top is simply a crowd following 'anti-consensus' retro-hipster wannabe. No real music person considers him in the same league as Paul and John. DCUM at its finest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:George is awesome, but anyone that ranks him at the top is simply a crowd following 'anti-consensus' retro-hipster wannabe. No real music person considers him in the same league as Paul and John. DCUM at its finest.
Disagree. Also the question was about how was the favorite Beatle, it wasn't "are you a real music person" WTF is that anyway, a sad boy who lives in his parents basement listening to vinyl?![]()
Yeah, will how old do you have to be to have a favorite beatle?
Signed,
three y.o. when they broke up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:George is awesome, but anyone that ranks him at the top is simply a crowd following 'anti-consensus' retro-hipster wannabe. No real music person considers him in the same league as Paul and John. DCUM at its finest.
Disagree. Also the question was about how was the favorite Beatle, it wasn't "are you a real music person" WTF is that anyway, a sad boy who lives in his parents basement listening to vinyl?![]()
Anonymous wrote:George is awesome, but anyone that ranks him at the top is simply a crowd following 'anti-consensus' retro-hipster wannabe. No real music person considers him in the same league as Paul and John. DCUM at its finest.
Anonymous wrote:Why is George not an option?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is George not an option?
He's a home run hitter, but his body of work just can't compare.
I think his work is vastly superior and that he was kept squashed by the ego of John who had to be out front and take credit for everything.
George is definitely my man. My Sweet Lord is seminal.
Anonymous wrote:Discuss. I prefer Paul. And I don't care how much the cool folk tell me I'm wrong.
Anonymous wrote:George doesn't have the baggage that John and Paul's public personas have, but his catalogue simply cannot compare. He has 4-5 great songs, comparable to John and Paul's best, but those guys each have dozens and dozens of songs, while George's list stops after about ten album worthy pieces.
I never really dug John's solo work, though I appreciate its significance. I like Paul's work on Wings the best in the solo arena. Their Beatles compositions were very close, but my preference for Paul is ultimately related to my presence for more up tempo, harder rock compositions. E.g., a case can be made that Paul invented metal/hard rock with Helter Skelter.