Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, ignore the haters. Here's my take on your situation.
Between two and two and a half years of age (when you say your nanny is leaving you) is the perfect time to start preschool. Your timing works out very well. I would put them in a preschool at that time, because this is just about the age when they actually benefit from other kids' company, and when they begin to need more stimulation than a nanny may be able to provide
18-month children do NOT need any "activities". They don't need libraries or, the height of parental illusions, museums. They need plenty of exercise, fresh air, and focused interaction. All that nonsense of story time, "music lessons" etc. is easily done by a competent nanny. If your nanny reads and sings to them with rattles scattered about, that's your story time and music right there. About the only thing that's actually age-appropriate and not easily outsourced at that age is swimming/pool time. But children don't die for lack of swimming so you're all good.
The only thing your nanny does wrong is not take children outside. Fresh air and movement is the number one non-negotiable in childcare. If your kids run around for a couple of hours minimum every day, you will have a dramatic improvement in how they eat, how they sleep and nap, how they behave, everything. Given that you have a nanny, I would insist on her taking the kids out. It's not that cold. If SHE doesn't want to go out, it's not a good reason.
Nonsense. Children of any age need consistent interaction with people other than their primary caregivers. Fact!
Anonymous wrote:OP, ignore the haters. Here's my take on your situation.
Between two and two and a half years of age (when you say your nanny is leaving you) is the perfect time to start preschool. Your timing works out very well. I would put them in a preschool at that time, because this is just about the age when they actually benefit from other kids' company, and when they begin to need more stimulation than a nanny may be able to provide
18-month children do NOT need any "activities". They don't need libraries or, the height of parental illusions, museums. They need plenty of exercise, fresh air, and focused interaction. All that nonsense of story time, "music lessons" etc. is easily done by a competent nanny. If your nanny reads and sings to them with rattles scattered about, that's your story time and music right there. About the only thing that's actually age-appropriate and not easily outsourced at that age is swimming/pool time. But children don't die for lack of swimming so you're all good.
The only thing your nanny does wrong is not take children outside. Fresh air and movement is the number one non-negotiable in childcare. If your kids run around for a couple of hours minimum every day, you will have a dramatic improvement in how they eat, how they sleep and nap, how they behave, everything. Given that you have a nanny, I would insist on her taking the kids out. It's not that cold. If SHE doesn't want to go out, it's not a good reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP and just wanted to chime in that I didn't let our beloved, wonderful nanny drive the kids, either. She was a nervous driver (OMG, watching her parallel park) and, honestly, I was hyper aware of my kids' safety.
That said, we live in a dense, walkable neighborhood with like 15 parks within an easy walk, plus lots of activities. OP, are you more isolated?
Oh, and we kept our nanny until both kids were in FT school (3.5 and 5,5). Mostly because we love our nanny and couldn't bear to part with her, but also because having a nanny is sooo much more convenient.
Thanks, PP. We're not in DC anymore and live in a slightly suburban area: two parks within walking distance and a cafe as well. We have a lot of snow on the ground here now though so it's not so easy to walk around this time of year. My nanny says she often prefers to stay inside because it's such a pain to get them suited up for the cold, which I completely understand. I mean, it's just a couple hours of activity time once you take away the time they spend eating.
So, rather than doing what is best for the children, you and she are doing what is easiest. Got it.
NP. Yeah. And you know what? I also stopped BFing before my children were two. I work outside the home. Once in a while, they watch TV.
Sometimes people do what works best for the family, not just the kid. Get over yourself.
Nothing you did sounds like a problem. You need to get over YOURself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP and just wanted to chime in that I didn't let our beloved, wonderful nanny drive the kids, either. She was a nervous driver (OMG, watching her parallel park) and, honestly, I was hyper aware of my kids' safety.
That said, we live in a dense, walkable neighborhood with like 15 parks within an easy walk, plus lots of activities. OP, are you more isolated?
Oh, and we kept our nanny until both kids were in FT school (3.5 and 5,5). Mostly because we love our nanny and couldn't bear to part with her, but also because having a nanny is sooo much more convenient.
Thanks, PP. We're not in DC anymore and live in a slightly suburban area: two parks within walking distance and a cafe as well. We have a lot of snow on the ground here now though so it's not so easy to walk around this time of year. My nanny says she often prefers to stay inside because it's such a pain to get them suited up for the cold, which I completely understand. I mean, it's just a couple hours of activity time once you take away the time they spend eating.
So, rather than doing what is best for the children, you and she are doing what is easiest. Got it.
NP. Yeah. And you know what? I also stopped BFing before my children were two. I work outside the home. Once in a while, they watch TV.
Sometimes people do what works best for the family, not just the kid. Get over yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP and just wanted to chime in that I didn't let our beloved, wonderful nanny drive the kids, either. She was a nervous driver (OMG, watching her parallel park) and, honestly, I was hyper aware of my kids' safety.
That said, we live in a dense, walkable neighborhood with like 15 parks within an easy walk, plus lots of activities. OP, are you more isolated?
Oh, and we kept our nanny until both kids were in FT school (3.5 and 5,5). Mostly because we love our nanny and couldn't bear to part with her, but also because having a nanny is sooo much more convenient.
Thanks, PP. We're not in DC anymore and live in a slightly suburban area: two parks within walking distance and a cafe as well. We have a lot of snow on the ground here now though so it's not so easy to walk around this time of year. My nanny says she often prefers to stay inside because it's such a pain to get them suited up for the cold, which I completely understand. I mean, it's just a couple hours of activity time once you take away the time they spend eating.
Anonymous wrote:NP and just wanted to chime in that I didn't let our beloved, wonderful nanny drive the kids, either. She was a nervous driver (OMG, watching her parallel park) and, honestly, I was hyper aware of my kids' safety.
That said, we live in a dense, walkable neighborhood with like 15 parks within an easy walk, plus lots of activities. OP, are you more isolated?
Oh, and we kept our nanny until both kids were in FT school (3.5 and 5,5). Mostly because we love our nanny and couldn't bear to part with her, but also because having a nanny is sooo much more convenient.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, OP again. The nanny is here for 5 hours a day, only 3.5 of which the children are awake--which is from 8:30 to noon (they get a snack and lunch during that window as well). I personally find it extremely difficult and stressful to drive my twins to places like the library, museum, etc, and I don't expect my nanny to do what I don't do myself. I don't think the benefits outweigh the risk (of a crash, of two kids running in different directions, etc).
She cleans your house when they're asleep, right? She isn't a nanny and you sound like a pill. Daycare would be best for you.
Anonymous wrote:OK, OP again. The nanny is here for 5 hours a day, only 3.5 of which the children are awake--which is from 8:30 to noon (they get a snack and lunch during that window as well). I personally find it extremely difficult and stressful to drive my twins to places like the library, museum, etc, and I don't expect my nanny to do what I don't do myself. I don't think the benefits outweigh the risk (of a crash, of two kids running in different directions, etc).
Anonymous wrote:OK, OP again. The nanny is here for 5 hours a day, only 3.5 of which the children are awake--which is from 8:30 to noon (they get a snack and lunch during that window as well). I personally find it extremely difficult and stressful to drive my twins to places like the library, museum, etc, and I don't expect my nanny to do what I don't do myself. I don't think the benefits outweigh the risk (of a crash, of two kids running in different directions, etc).