Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were looking for houses in silver spring when we won the lottery and bought in NE DC instead.
I think the question is what would have happened if you and you neighbors actually gave it a shot and enrolled in your DCPS instead of automatically assuming DCPS wouldn't cut it. I am a charter parent so I'm not making judgments I am also curious about this question. Deal for instance was largely OOB until the last decade or so. Now you see the same changes being made at Bancroft, Hardy, Shepherd, Brent, Ross, Eaton, Hearst. Folk EOTP are just as wealthy and educated as WOTP if they would've collectively enrolled in DCPS would they have changed faster or did DCPS need the competition of charters? Chicken or the egg. Personally, I think charters lit the fire but would like to see DCPS continue to make a comeback. Charters also introduced more school choice which has hurt DCPS and charters alike. Too much movement and too many parents feel entitled to a tailored for school that offers XYZ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We stayed in DC for our EOTP DCPS. But I think your question is oversimplified BS and unnecessarily divisive. This is DCUM, not Fox News.
How is this divisive? Its a calculation every single parent is probably making at some point, Hell if DCPS was smart they would be the one asking this question. With a follow up "what specifically can DCPS do to get you to stay at your IB" (tracking, test in, gifted classes--but that is roundly ignored so they stop asking).
Anonymous wrote:We were looking for houses in silver spring when we won the lottery and bought in NE DC instead.
Anonymous wrote:We stayed in DC for our EOTP DCPS. But I think your question is oversimplified BS and unnecessarily divisive. This is DCUM, not Fox News.
Anonymous wrote:If there were no charters, I think we would have a majority middle/high SES elementary school (Watkins). The demographics exist in the neighborhood but so many of the kids end up somewhere else starting in pk3, pk4 and K. I don't think the neighborhood would have gentrified to this extent without charters, but I would love to see them abolished tomorrow and see how things shake out. Sadly that ship has sailed.
Anonymous wrote:Overall #2. But it's catch 22. DCPS in our neighborhood is good (Shepherd) although many historically have and will continue to always go private. Citywide, if it weren't for charters I don't think DCPS would even be competitive as they are today.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If there were no charters, I think we would have a majority middle/high SES elementary school (Watkins). The demographics exist in the neighborhood but so many of the kids end up somewhere else starting in pk3, pk4 and K. I don't think the neighborhood would have gentrified to this extent without charters, but I would love to see them abolished tomorrow and see how things shake out. Sadly that ship has sailed.
No charters is not the same thing as everyone going to their in-boundary DCPS school.