Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree, our DDs from Sidwell had GPAs of 3.7-3.8 and got into HYPS, almost no one has a 4.0. There is no weighting in the GPAs themselves. But clearly the admissions people at the top universities know exactly which courses are the most challenging track and even which teachers are super tough graders and take that into account, with input from the Sidwell college counselors.
This is still true nowadays at sidwell?
Anonymous wrote:Agree, our DDs from Sidwell had GPAs of 3.7-3.8 and got into HYPS, almost no one has a 4.0. There is no weighting in the GPAs themselves. But clearly the admissions people at the top universities know exactly which courses are the most challenging track and even which teachers are super tough graders and take that into account, with input from the Sidwell college counselors.
Anonymous wrote:I would also agree with the importance of recommendation letters. Some Sidwell students are very bright and passionate, but it does not show in the GPAs. It requires a high level of executive function to get through Sidwell, and some students have not matured to that level. Recommendations can help overcome those weaknesses. I know students with GPAs in the B- range who got into excellent colleges because of strong testing and recommendations. Not Ivies, but excellent smaller schools. Colleges know that if you have made it through Sidwell, you will do fine in college.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and can say that what we're told -- recommendations matter -- really seems to be true. Over my career I've had colleges directly contact me at times to thank me for a letter or respond to my offer of being willing to talk more about the student. Knowing my letters are really being read, and can make a difference, really motivates me to do the best I can to support my students with my recommendation letters.
The strength of recommendation letters is definitely something not easily captured in Naviance scattergrams -- it would be a mistake NOT to pay attention to the numbers, but there is also more to the process.
Lastly, every year I see some kids coming out of the college process who are disappointed -- they aim high and get a batch of waiting lists (way more common than when I started teaching) and rejections from the top 10 schools, and sort of reluctantly try to get excited about the schools to which they have been admitted. And then 99% of them, when they come back at Thanksgiving or Winter Break, are thrilled with their choice and doing such amazing and interesting things (way more impressive than what I recall doing in college!). And the few kids who feel like a fish out of water at their original school often transfer and are thrilled with where they end up. Honestly, it usually does work out. They are so well prepared for the next step and the more they realize that, the more they grow in confidence and shrug off the December or April sting of a rejection letter.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and can say that what we're told -- recommendations matter -- really seems to be true. Over my career I've had colleges directly contact me at times to thank me for a letter or respond to my offer of being willing to talk more about the student. Knowing my letters are really being read, and can make a difference, really motivates me to do the best I can to support my students with my recommendation letters.
The strength of recommendation letters is definitely something not easily captured in Naviance scattergrams -- it would be a mistake NOT to pay attention to the numbers, but there is also more to the process.
Lastly, every year I see some kids coming out of the college process who are disappointed -- they aim high and get a batch of waiting lists (way more common than when I started teaching) and rejections from the top 10 schools, and sort of reluctantly try to get excited about the schools to which they have been admitted. And then 99% of them, when they come back at Thanksgiving or Winter Break, are thrilled with their choice and doing such amazing and interesting things (way more impressive than what I recall doing in college!). And the few kids who feel like a fish out of water at their original school often transfer and are thrilled with where they end up. Honestly, it usually does work out. They are so well prepared for the next step and the more they realize that, the more they grow in confidence and shrug off the December or April sting of a rejection letter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're claiming a 3.5 unhooked kid has a shot at HYPS, you're crazy. What are you considering a "top" school?
I would agree, although I wouldn't express it quite so forcefully! I would also agree those 3.5 students can get into some great schools that I'd consider "top" in the big picture. However, if folks think that a student with a 3.5 GPA who does not have one of the big hooks (such as legacy, recruited athlete) has a good chance at the most sought-after schools (HYPS, Duke, other Ivies) I do think they are setting themselves up for disappointment. Obviously there are exceptions, but people need to be realistic, and the sooner they realize that a top 10 school isn't the only "top" school, the happier and more relaxed the student (and parents) will be. Plenty of wonderful schools such as Davidson, Pomona, Middlebury, Bowdoin, Amherst, Williams, UVA, UNC, U. Michigan, Wake Forest, Macalester, Carleton, Claremont McKenna, the Service Academies, Haverford, Swarthmore, Wesleyan, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, Rice, Wash. U, Georgetown, Notre Dame, just to name some.
Generally agree, though, a rigorous courseload can be a critical plus factor for an unhooked kid.
Agreed. I have also over the years occasionally seen acceptances by the HYPS type schools student who was truly brilliant (creative genius type) in one discipline (e.g., humanities), but not so strong in the other discipline (which was reflected in the GPA). This would be the type of student whose teacher would write something like "one of the best writers I have ever taught in my career." Sometimes real and exciting brilliance in one subject can offset a lack of academic excellence across the board. I have seen MIT do this for STEM students and Yale for the humanities, and the University of Chicago also seems quite interested in students with very interesting minds (and correspondingly more willing to depart from just accepting those with the highest GPA\test score axis).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're claiming a 3.5 unhooked kid has a shot at HYPS, you're crazy. What are you considering a "top" school?
I would agree, although I wouldn't express it quite so forcefully! I would also agree those 3.5 students can get into some great schools that I'd consider "top" in the big picture. However, if folks think that a student with a 3.5 GPA who does not have one of the big hooks (such as legacy, recruited athlete) has a good chance at the most sought-after schools (HYPS, Duke, other Ivies) I do think they are setting themselves up for disappointment. Obviously there are exceptions, but people need to be realistic, and the sooner they realize that a top 10 school isn't the only "top" school, the happier and more relaxed the student (and parents) will be. Plenty of wonderful schools such as Davidson, Pomona, Middlebury, Bowdoin, Amherst, Williams, UVA, UNC, U. Michigan, Wake Forest, Macalester, Carleton, Claremont McKenna, the Service Academies, Haverford, Swarthmore, Wesleyan, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, Rice, Wash. U, Georgetown, Notre Dame, just to name some.
Generally agree, though, a rigorous courseload can be a critical plus factor for an unhooked kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're claiming a 3.5 unhooked kid has a shot at HYPS, you're crazy. What are you considering a "top" school?
I would agree, although I wouldn't express it quite so forcefully! I would also agree those 3.5 students can get into some great schools that I'd consider "top" in the big picture. However, if folks think that a student with a 3.5 GPA who does not have one of the big hooks (such as legacy, recruited athlete) has a good chance at the most sought-after schools (HYPS, Duke, other Ivies) I do think they are setting themselves up for disappointment. Obviously there are exceptions, but people need to be realistic, and the sooner they realize that a top 10 school isn't the only "top" school, the happier and more relaxed the student (and parents) will be. Plenty of wonderful schools such as Davidson, Pomona, Middlebury, Bowdoin, Amherst, Williams, UVA, UNC, U. Michigan, Wake Forest, Macalester, Carleton, Claremont McKenna, the Service Academies, Haverford, Swarthmore, Wesleyan, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, Rice, Wash. U, Georgetown, Notre Dame, just to name some.