Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
So why limit it to modeling? Why not pass a law imposing jail time on anyone that falls below a BMI of 18? Also I don't think anorexia is a bigger problem than obesity. About 10,000 times as many people die from obesity-related desires. Any-skinny laws like these are passed by jealous, fat legislators.
Because we can't outlaw personal behavior. But we cannot event an industry from forcing people to starve in order to get a job.
You can't do either in the U.S. The EU law would unconditional in the U.S. under the first amendment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
So why limit it to modeling? Why not pass a law imposing jail time on anyone that falls below a BMI of 18? Also I don't think anorexia is a bigger problem than obesity. About 10,000 times as many people die from obesity-related desires. Any-skinny laws like these are passed by jealous, fat legislators.
Because we can't outlaw personal behavior. But we cannot event an industry from forcing people to starve in order to get a job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
So why limit it to modeling? Why not pass a law imposing jail time on anyone that falls below a BMI of 18? Also I don't think anorexia is a bigger problem than obesity. About 10,000 times as many people die from obesity-related desires. Any-skinny laws like these are passed by jealous, fat legislators.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The BMI requirmen under the EU law is 18
honestly that is high for a minimum. i had a bmi of 17.5 in high school and now i'm just under 18 in my 40s. i don't diet, never been anorexic - just naturally thin, but there are plenty of women thinner than me, especially in france.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Do you understand the term "occupational safety"?
BTW jockeys weights are set by the state racing commission, i.e. government.
I do understand the term occupational safety. The problem with over-regulation is that we get things like the homeless being denied donations of day-old bagels because of carb content.
There are some women that are naturally tall and gangly. Others do starve themselves. At what point is the cut-off point regarding personal choice?
Wow really? You don't know much about the industry do you? Most of the models are underage and there have been deaths and serious health issues. Guess in your world your kids would be at the coal mine for a 12 hour shift. Its Sunday, maybe you should get back to work?
Anonymous wrote:The BMI requirmen under the EU law is 18
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
You haven't made a point.
One supermodel was advised to eat only a rice cake a day, while others are offered subtle hints, often backed up by contract stipulations, to lose inches. Related health hazards are also present; 68 percent of the workforce suffers from anxiety and/or depression, noted the same survey. A quarter profess drug or alcohol dependency, and around a third said they lacked health insurance (although the survey took place in 2012, before the Affordable Care Act was implemented).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
She looks healthier than this:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
She looks healthier than this:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Do you understand the term "occupational safety"?
BTW jockeys weights are set by the state racing commission, i.e. government.
I do understand the term occupational safety. The problem with over-regulation is that we get things like the homeless being denied donations of day-old bagels because of carb content.
There are some women that are naturally tall and gangly. Others do starve themselves. At what point is the cut-off point regarding personal choice?
Wow really? You don't know much about the industry do you? Most of the models are underage and there have been deaths and serious health issues. Guess in your world your kids would be at the coal mine for a 12 hour shift. Its Sunday, maybe you should get back to work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Ah, yes.
Standards imposed by industry = good
Standards imposed by government = evil
Because industry can do no wrong, but government is evil, so say the Gods of Libertarianism
Never mind that, unlike government, industry is unelected and unaccountable to the public, never mind that all that evil government regulation out there is in response to industry abuses.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Do you understand the term "occupational safety"?
BTW jockeys weights are set by the state racing commission, i.e. government.
I do understand the term occupational safety. The problem with over-regulation is that we get things like the homeless being denied donations of day-old bagels because of carb content.
There are some women that are naturally tall and gangly. Others do starve themselves. At what point is the cut-off point regarding personal choice?