Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know with a lot of adoptees you can say that the BM wasnt able to care for a baby, or was young, etc etc. But that wont ring true in our situation.
I have three adopted children. The question of why their parents didn't keep them comes up every now and then. My answer is always "I don't know" because I really don't. One of my kids has an older sibling whom the birth mother kept. When he asked why her and not him, again, "I don't know." There are just aren't answers to every question our kids ask and that's ok for us to admit that to our kids. I would never say that the birth parents couldn't care for them unless I knew that to be true, which I don't. [/quote
How can you not have any idea? Don't you think you owe your children some explanation? I think what you are doing will ultimately be harmful and leave them with questions and doubts. Please consult a social worker for some guidance on how to talk to your children about their adoption.
Many people don't get any history when they adopt a child - me included. If I knew the answers, I would tell my kids. But since I don't, I don't understand why you think it would be more harmful to tell my children the truth than to make up a lie? I don't get your thinking at all. Of course my kids are going to have questions and doubts because there aren't answers to their questions. They will just have to find peace with that.
Adoption social workers will tell you that what you are supposed to do is exactly what PP said she is doing -- say I don't know when you don't know and provide details at a level that's developmentally-appropriate when you do know them. Keep it simple, answer what's asked, let the child lead, and resist the impulse to smooth things over with platitudes or happy tales. Keep the door open to further questions and allow a range of emotions to be expressed without trying to direct feelings one way or the other. It might also help to think about the language that you use when talking about adoption (e.g. your child was placed vs. given up and she was adopted vs. she's an adoptee). For some people, the semantics don't matter, but for others it does. Here's a link with some more information: http://www.barkeradoptionfoundation.org/not-giving-up-placing-for-adoption-friendly-language-101
Agree with PP. I am also adopted and have recently reunited with my birth family. My parents weren't given any information about me so they also used the "they loved you so much" line. In the beginning stages of my search, I was given info that I thought was the correct story. When I reunited, it turned out that that info was completely wrong and I was basically stolen from my birth mom. I guess my point is that even if you do have information, that info might not be correct anyway.
I also have an adopted child; I have some information but again, who knows what is truth or not?
Anonymous wrote:i am one of the adoptive moms who tells her kids the truth, which is we don't know why. If that were the truth, I would tell them eventually. Im really surprised at you guys who think it's better to make up a sweet story. They grow up, you know, and they can find out. I would love it if my kids find their birth families one day and it turned out beautiffully with full acceptance from them. But I know for a fact that isn't always the case. I tell them what I know - they needed a family and we wanted a baby and fate put us together. We all had to go through rough times and loss to get here. I can't write their story before we met, so I don't know about their birth parents. What I do know is that I love them more than anything in this world.Anonymous wrote:Would you tell them the truth if they are the result of rape or incest?
i am one of the adoptive moms who tells her kids the truth, which is we don't know why. If that were the truth, I would tell them eventually. Im really surprised at you guys who think it's better to make up a sweet story. They grow up, you know, and they can find out. I would love it if my kids find their birth families one day and it turned out beautiffully with full acceptance from them. But I know for a fact that isn't always the case. I tell them what I know - they needed a family and we wanted a baby and fate put us together. We all had to go through rough times and loss to get here. I can't write their story before we met, so I don't know about their birth parents. What I do know is that I love them more than anything in this world.Anonymous wrote:Would you tell them the truth if they are the result of rape or incest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know with a lot of adoptees you can say that the BM wasnt able to care for a baby, or was young, etc etc. But that wont ring true in our situation.
I have three adopted children. The question of why their parents didn't keep them comes up every now and then. My answer is always "I don't know" because I really don't. One of my kids has an older sibling whom the birth mother kept. When he asked why her and not him, again, "I don't know." There are just aren't answers to every question our kids ask and that's ok for us to admit that to our kids. I would never say that the birth parents couldn't care for them unless I knew that to be true, which I don't. [/quote
How can you not have any idea? Don't you think you owe your children some explanation? I think what you are doing will ultimately be harmful and leave them with questions and doubts. Please consult a social worker for some guidance on how to talk to your children about their adoption.
Many people don't get any history when they adopt a child - me included. If I knew the answers, I would tell my kids. But since I don't, I don't understand why you think it would be more harmful to tell my children the truth than to make up a lie? I don't get your thinking at all. Of course my kids are going to have questions and doubts because there aren't answers to their questions. They will just have to find peace with that.
Adoption social workers will tell you that what you are supposed to do is exactly what PP said she is doing -- say I don't know when you don't know and provide details at a level that's developmentally-appropriate when you do know them. Keep it simple, answer what's asked, let the child lead, and resist the impulse to smooth things over with platitudes or happy tales. Keep the door open to further questions and allow a range of emotions to be expressed without trying to direct feelings one way or the other. It might also help to think about the language that you use when talking about adoption (e.g. your child was placed vs. given up and she was adopted vs. she's an adoptee). For some people, the semantics don't matter, but for others it does. Here's a link with some more information: http://www.barkeradoptionfoundation.org/not-giving-up-placing-for-adoption-friendly-language-101
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know with a lot of adoptees you can say that the BM wasnt able to care for a baby, or was young, etc etc. But that wont ring true in our situation.
I have three adopted children. The question of why their parents didn't keep them comes up every now and then. My answer is always "I don't know" because I really don't. One of my kids has an older sibling whom the birth mother kept. When he asked why her and not him, again, "I don't know." There are just aren't answers to every question our kids ask and that's ok for us to admit that to our kids. I would never say that the birth parents couldn't care for them unless I knew that to be true, which I don't. [/quote
How can you not have any idea? Don't you think you owe your children some explanation? I think what you are doing will ultimately be harmful and leave them with questions and doubts. Please consult a social worker for some guidance on how to talk to your children about their adoption.
Many people don't get any history when they adopt a child - me included. If I knew the answers, I would tell my kids. But since I don't, I don't understand why you think it would be more harmful to tell my children the truth than to make up a lie? I don't get your thinking at all. Of course my kids are going to have questions and doubts because there aren't answers to their questions. They will just have to find peace with that.
Anonymous wrote:I know with a lot of adoptees you can say that the BM wasnt able to care for a baby, or was young, etc etc. But that wont ring true in our situation.
I have three adopted children. The question of why their parents didn't keep them comes up every now and then. My answer is always "I don't know" because I really don't. One of my kids has an older sibling whom the birth mother kept. When he asked why her and not him, again, "I don't know." There are just aren't answers to every question our kids ask and that's ok for us to admit that to our kids. I would never say that the birth parents couldn't care for them unless I knew that to be true, which I don't. [/quote
How can you not have any idea? Don't you think you owe your children some explanation? I think what you are doing will ultimately be harmful and leave them with questions and doubts. Please consult a social worker for some guidance on how to talk to your children about their adoption.
Anonymous wrote:Although that sounds lovely I don't actually know if it's the truth and I'm not going to fill his head with a fairy tale...what if he meets her at some point and learns the reality was completely different? And, what would it say about the children she is parenting?
No. My answer is that I don't know why she made this choice. I can offer some possibilities, but it is not for me to answer this question.
Anonymous wrote:At some point one of my sons will learn that his birthmother is raising 2 of his siblings, but not him. When he asks me why, I will tell him that I am not certain.
I used to like the answer above about it meant that she loved him enough to place him for adoption and blah blah blah....Although that sounds lovely I don't actually know if it's the truth and I'm not going to fill his head with a fairy tale...what if he meets her at some point and learns the reality was completely different? And, what would it say about the children she is parenting?
No. My answer is that I don't know why she made this choice. I can offer some possibilities, but it is not for me to answer this question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. and add, loved her 3rd child enough to admit biomom couldn't take care of her and make sure that another family would give her all the love and support she deserved. Giving up a child isnt a failure if love, it is the most loving and selfless thing a parent can do in certain situations.
Children do not fall for this line of crap. She kept two and gave me away! Why? What is wrong with me? This is how a child thinks. Adults will understand but not a young child. Also, she will want to know her two siblings. This is a huge mess, OP. Tred carefully.
I have a cousin who adopted a child under similar for circumstances and it was very difficult.