Anonymous
11/30/2015 15:06
Subject: Re:Age 40+ - what protocol yielded your best results?
Anonymous wrote:Someone posted a link to an article about the study in another thread. I have the whole article but I don't think we can attach things here.
The study did not look at embryo quality. It looked at live birth rates.
Anonymous
11/30/2015 14:19
Subject: Re:Age 40+ - what protocol yielded your best results?
Someone posted a link to an article about the study in another thread. I have the whole article but I don't think we can attach things here.
Anonymous
11/29/2015 09:53
Subject: Re:Age 40+ - what protocol yielded your best results?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If everyone could list their dosages, please, that would be helpful. Did you read the article that just came out (the nytimes linked to it earlier this week) that says higher stim doses create lower quality embryos? I'm trying to decide whether to use 450 FSH this cycle rather than 600.
Can you link to that, please? Couldn't find it.
Thanks!
The study does NOT say that (that higher dosages cause ANYTHING). If you do not understand the study, ask your RE. Correlation is not the same as causation.
Anonymous
11/29/2015 09:03
Subject: Re:Age 40+ - what protocol yielded your best results?
Anonymous wrote:If everyone could list their dosages, please, that would be helpful. Did you read the article that just came out (the nytimes linked to it earlier this week) that says higher stim doses create lower quality embryos? I'm trying to decide whether to use 450 FSH this cycle rather than 600.
Can you link to that, please? Couldn't find it.
Thanks!