Anonymous wrote:
Cleveland Park already has a community pool, at the Cleveland Park Club which is relatively inexpensive to join compared to most private pools.
Anonymous wrote:
BTW, the "broad stretch" of 37th St. is likely to be reconfigured by DDOT (narrowed in places, speed bumps, curb extensions, raised crosswalks more parking restrictions), as part of the planning process to address the traffic from both Hearst and the expanded Sidwell campus. So don't assume that all of those parking spots will necessarily remain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is one of the few full-sized fields around, and the tennis courts are heavily used. I don't see where the pool can go, unless these resources are thrown away. I agree that the upper portion is pretty tight, but is there anything else planned for where the temporary building is now? That could be "found space." The other question about a pool that is going to attract a lot of users is parking. The streets surrounding the park are parked full during the day and even on weekends the spots fill up with constant Stoddert soccer league games. I guess that the Hearst school parking lot could become the pool lot after school hours and in summer. There's no other spot on the parcel to add parking.
The pools around the city are only open during the summer. Usually there isn't school in session or Stoddert soccer taking place. As such, with the broad stretch of 37th Street, there really shouldn't be a parking issue. Plus, I would guess most of the heavy users will be the people who live in that immediate North Cleveland Park area. McLean Gardens has its own pool, as does Cleveland Park (Club).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is one of the few full-sized fields around, and the tennis courts are heavily used. I don't see where the pool can go, unless these resources are thrown away. I agree that the upper portion is pretty tight, but is there anything else planned for where the temporary building is now? That could be "found space." The other question about a pool that is going to attract a lot of users is parking. The streets surrounding the park are parked full during the day and even on weekends the spots fill up with constant Stoddert soccer league games. I guess that the Hearst school parking lot could become the pool lot after school hours and in summer. There's no other spot on the parcel to add parking.
The pools around the city are only open during the summer. Usually there isn't school in session or Stoddert soccer taking place. As such, with the broad stretch of 37th Street, there really shouldn't be a parking issue. Plus, I would guess most of the heavy users will be the people who live in that immediate North Cleveland Park area. McLean Gardens has its own pool, as does Cleveland Park (Club).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A better spot for an ourdoor pool for Ward 3 might be in the vicinity of Wilson/Deal, which is very central, with good parking and near public transportation.
No empty land over there that isn't federal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is one of the few full-sized fields around, and the tennis courts are heavily used. I don't see where the pool can go, unless these resources are thrown away. I agree that the upper portion is pretty tight, but is there anything else planned for where the temporary building is now? That could be "found space." The other question about a pool that is going to attract a lot of users is parking. The streets surrounding the park are parked full during the day and even on weekends the spots fill up with constant Stoddert soccer league games. I guess that the Hearst school parking lot could become the pool lot after school hours and in summer. There's no other spot on the parcel to add parking.
The pools around the city are only open during the summer. Usually there isn't school in session or Stoddert soccer taking place. As such, with the broad stretch of 37th Street, there really shouldn't be a parking issue. Plus, I would guess most of the heavy users will be the people who live in that immediate North Cleveland Park area. McLean Gardens has its own pool, as does Cleveland Park (Club).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Make no mistake, any pool will immediately turn into a draw for visitors from all Wards. Just like the spray parks at Livingston and Lafayette.
Have you seen a map of the outdoor pools in DC?
http://app.dpr.dc.gov/dprmap/index.asp?group=5&query=AND{%277%27.EX.%27Outdoor%20Pool%27}
All of the other neighborhoods have outdoor pools already. Why would you assume people will be coming from far corners to this facility? And I haven't seen many beyond those in the community at the spraygrounds at Macomb, Turtle Park, Lafayette or Livingston.
I think this would be fantastic for the community.
I assume that people will come from elsewhere in the city to a nice, brand-new facility because that's what happens. Especially the nannies, but also parents. I assume this because this has been my observation while living in CCDC for the past 15 years.
And.... could you define "the community" ? what would say the boundaries of "the community" are, for example?
Immediate community would be Cathedral Heights, Cleveland Park and North Cleveland Park. But I meant community as in you know, the people who live in the city who would like to use an outdoor pool in a convenient manner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Make no mistake, any pool will immediately turn into a draw for visitors from all Wards. Just like the spray parks at Livingston and Lafayette.
Have you seen a map of the outdoor pools in DC?
http://app.dpr.dc.gov/dprmap/index.asp?group=5&query=AND{%277%27.EX.%27Outdoor%20Pool%27}
All of the other neighborhoods have outdoor pools already. Why would you assume people will be coming from far corners to this facility? And I haven't seen many beyond those in the community at the spraygrounds at Macomb, Turtle Park, Lafayette or Livingston.
I think this would be fantastic for the community.
I assume that people will come from elsewhere in the city to a nice, brand-new facility because that's what happens. Especially the nannies, but also parents. I assume this because this has been my observation while living in CCDC for the past 15 years.
And.... could you define "the community" ? what would say the boundaries of "the community" are, for example?
Except most of the rest of the city has new and clean pools, that is except Ward 3. If nannies and parents want to use a pool, terrific. If seniors want to use a pool, terrific. WTF is wrong with you? Or are you a sourpuss who lives across from Hearst and is going to fight this for your own selfishness?
Anonymous wrote:Awesome news! We participated in some of the community surveys, and would LOVE an outdoor park in that space. And I think the "community" in this case is the community of residents of Washington DC, all of whom are entitled to use the city's pools. Easy bus access via H buses and the 96/X3/30 buses on Wisconsin.
I'd also like to see a dog park -- there are a ton of people who run their dogs off-leash in the park, and it's a nuisance, especially when they do it just at the same time kids are on their way to school. So it would be great to see a fenced-in safe area for dog-owners.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Make no mistake, any pool will immediately turn into a draw for visitors from all Wards. Just like the spray parks at Livingston and Lafayette.
Have you seen a map of the outdoor pools in DC?
http://app.dpr.dc.gov/dprmap/index.asp?group=5&query=AND{%277%27.EX.%27Outdoor%20Pool%27}
All of the other neighborhoods have outdoor pools already. Why would you assume people will be coming from far corners to this facility? And I haven't seen many beyond those in the community at the spraygrounds at Macomb, Turtle Park, Lafayette or Livingston.
I think this would be fantastic for the community.
I assume that people will come from elsewhere in the city to a nice, brand-new facility because that's what happens. Especially the nannies, but also parents. I assume this because this has been my observation while living in CCDC for the past 15 years.
And.... could you define "the community" ? what would say the boundaries of "the community" are, for example?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Make no mistake, any pool will immediately turn into a draw for visitors from all Wards. Just like the spray parks at Livingston and Lafayette.
Have you seen a map of the outdoor pools in DC?
http://app.dpr.dc.gov/dprmap/index.asp?group=5&query=AND{%277%27.EX.%27Outdoor%20Pool%27}
All of the other neighborhoods have outdoor pools already. Why would you assume people will be coming from far corners to this facility? And I haven't seen many beyond those in the community at the spraygrounds at Macomb, Turtle Park, Lafayette or Livingston.
I think this would be fantastic for the community.
I assume that people will come from elsewhere in the city to a nice, brand-new facility because that's what happens. Especially the nannies, but also parents. I assume this because this has been my observation while living in CCDC for the past 15 years.
And.... could you define "the community" ? what would say the boundaries of "the community" are, for example?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There isn't room for a pool on the upper area so I wouldn't worry about that. An outdoor pool down below would be a great asset for the community.[/quote]
Make no mistake, any pool will immediately turn into a draw for visitors from all Wards. Just like the spray parks at Livingston and Lafayette.
Oh no, not the other wards! Thankfully ward three will do their best to make everyone, especially the brown people, feel unwelcome.
Ever noticed the enrollment at the Macomb playground program? You clearly don't know what your talking about.