Anonymous wrote:Fortunately, our older son is not much of a "burden." We paid for all of his college (a LAC) and grad school and helped him buy a place in DC (bought in a very "up and coming" area when it wasn't very expensive and did well). He's a teacher, very socially conscientious and an all-round good person with good values. Do they live in a place that's beyond what most at their income would make? Yes - but that's not a problem. At least they're generally appreciative and don't expect to always piggyback off us!
#1's wife (DIL 1) would make an excellent mother but can't conceive. So they've been trying adoption or surrogacy - both fraught with difficulties!
But #1 seems to have a lot of resentment towards #2 - I think he feels less loved especially since the grandchildren were born. I think they feel it's unfair they can't have children like they've long wanted and that the "#2s" can "just pop out children" (to put it crudely). He also thinks they are spoiled and entitled!
#1 has even insisted: I've benefited immensely enough, and you don't need to leave me money. Leave it to grandchildren, for college, to a good cause, to hardworking cousins who are struggling etc. I appreciate the noble sentiment but let's see where things are at in the future.
I remind though that he doesn't want to trade places with #2 (and he certainly agrees). #2 is unhappy and feels greatly ashamed.
It's kind of unfair to leave both sons different amounts though because we don't want to "play favorites".
Anonymous wrote:Do not EVER give them money "for the grandchildren." If you want the grandkids to take ice skating lessons, pay the ice skating place DIRECTLY. They sound capable, but just lazy and like they're counting on you to support them.
Stop buying condos for your son.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the Colorado ski place and have no condo in SF.
Your children are useless for providing the lifestyle to the GC. Rental property is a hassle. It's not like you own a few buildings with 20 plus units.
Get a geographically accessible place at a DE beach. Not New England. Once the GC are older they might have summer stuff here that would preclude use.
Put yourself in a nice DC area condo and the ingrates in a small house with a good public school district for at least k-8. The reality is only you will be able to give the grandchildren the life you want.
+1 I think that is good advice. It would allow the son to have some pride of his own as he could handle visiting the beach house without extra gas money.
Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the Colorado ski place and have no condo in SF.
Your children are useless for providing the lifestyle to the GC. Rental property is a hassle. It's not like you own a few buildings with 20 plus units.
Get a geographically accessible place at a DE beach. Not New England. Once the GC are older they might have summer stuff here that would preclude use.
Put yourself in a nice DC area condo and the ingrates in a small house with a good public school district for at least k-8. The reality is only you will be able to give the grandchildren the life you want.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe you should acknowledge that they're not the only ones who have f*cked up. They don't have jobs because they've never had to get jobs and that's on you.
Anonymous wrote:Bailing them out is not helping. You've created this monster, and you seem determined to visit it on their children as well. Stop!!!!