Anonymous wrote:Right, because a family with small children buying tickets to Europe at Christmas is going be a piece of cake...
Shit, it costs us a pretty penny just to get to fucking Texas with 4 people (and one is a baby).
That is dumb advice.
Okay...so your father has always been a cautious man who has lived his life calculating risks, but you don't give a damn about his feelings/concerns because you don't have the same emotional make-up. Who exactly has the problem here? Empathy is not your strong suit, but self-absorption seems to be.Anonymous wrote:
OP here.
Thanks for the support!
My father has always been VERY cautious all his life. He never borrowed money, never does anything that he isn't sure will be successful. He's not reacting in a traditional emotional sense, but definitely in a calculating-risks sort of way.
But he's wrong. I told him all hyper-protected major venues would probably be fine, and that terrorists would try to hit unguarded "soft targets" like in Paris (secondary concert halls, suburban transports, etc). And that therefore we can't change our lifestyle or habits, since there are a dozen soft targets we go to every week!
Hopefully I can change his mind.
This. They are entitled to their feelings even if you think they are unfounded.Anonymous wrote:If your parents are genuinely frightened, try to have some empathy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:because resorts aren't a possible target?
I think the idea is that OP's parents may be frightened because there is a specific ISIS video informing the world that Washington is the next target. Resorts, while they may be a target, are not the specific focus of anxiety.
Anonymous wrote:because resorts aren't a possible target?
Anonymous wrote:If your parents are genuinely frightened, try to have some empathy.
Anonymous wrote:
OP here.
Thanks for the support!
My father has always been VERY cautious all his life. He never borrowed money, never does anything that he isn't sure will be successful. He's not reacting in a traditional emotional sense, but definitely in a calculating-risks sort of way.
But he's wrong. I told him all hyper-protected major venues would probably be fine, and that terrorists would try to hit unguarded "soft targets" like in Paris (secondary concert halls, suburban transports, etc). And that therefore we can't change our lifestyle or habits, since there are a dozen soft targets we go to every week!
Hopefully I can change his mind.