Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
Maybe because the USA has a higher standard for children.
You think we have more higher standards than most of Western Europe and Canada and Australia? No. If we did, we'd have way more social services. We do, however, have a system where a parent can sue the school district to push for services. In some ways, that's a good thing, obviously. But, certainly, there are wealthy parents that have the means to abuse the system.
You think there is an epidemic of wealthy parents suing the school systems to get their non-autistic children autism services?![]()
+1. Rich parents want their NT children labeled autistic and want unneeded services and/or tuition for SN schools enough to file for due process at great $$$ against school systems. Really?!?![]()
Some do. Do they publicize it? Of course not. No one would admit to it, but it happens.
https://autismandoughtisms.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/when-a-doctor-over-diagnoses-autism/
There is a particular doctor who is well-known in the local autism community, for being the “go-to” guy when you can’t get anyone else to confirm that your child has autism. (Hear alarm bells going off already?) I’ve personally heard and seen his name recommended to others in that capacity.....
I’ve seen this doctor particularly recommended to people who were keen to get government paid financial assistance for their difficult child. This same doctor is also known for being a bit too fond of medicating children, where other pediatricians are far more reluctant to fall back on medicating the young.
He’s not cheap either, if you don’t approach him through the public system. You’re looking at almost $400 for an hour session, which is all he requires to make a diagnosis."
There are other stories. Like I said. I don't think it's common, but it does happy, and no one's going to admit it out loud.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
Maybe because the USA has a higher standard for children.
You think we have more higher standards than most of Western Europe and Canada and Australia? No. If we did, we'd have way more social services. We do, however, have a system where a parent can sue the school district to push for services. In some ways, that's a good thing, obviously. But, certainly, there are wealthy parents that have the means to abuse the system.
You think there is an epidemic of wealthy parents suing the school systems to get their non-autistic children autism services?![]()
I didn't say there was an epidemic of it, but wealthy parents do have the means and sometimes will abuse the system.
The ones I know with the means to sue, don't. They go private instead. Very few suits are filed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
Maybe because the USA has a higher standard for children.
You think we have more higher standards than most of Western Europe and Canada and Australia? No. If we did, we'd have way more social services. We do, however, have a system where a parent can sue the school district to push for services. In some ways, that's a good thing, obviously. But, certainly, there are wealthy parents that have the means to abuse the system.
You think there is an epidemic of wealthy parents suing the school systems to get their non-autistic children autism services?![]()
+1. Rich parents want their NT children labeled autistic and want unneeded services and/or tuition for SN schools enough to file for due process at great $$$ against school systems. Really?!?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
Maybe because the USA has a higher standard for children.
You think we have more higher standards than most of Western Europe and Canada and Australia? No. If we did, we'd have way more social services. We do, however, have a system where a parent can sue the school district to push for services. In some ways, that's a good thing, obviously. But, certainly, there are wealthy parents that have the means to abuse the system.
You think there is an epidemic of wealthy parents suing the school systems to get their non-autistic children autism services?![]()
I didn't say there was an epidemic of it, but wealthy parents do have the means and sometimes will abuse the system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
Maybe because the USA has a higher standard for children.
You think we have more higher standards than most of Western Europe and Canada and Australia? No. If we did, we'd have way more social services. We do, however, have a system where a parent can sue the school district to push for services. In some ways, that's a good thing, obviously. But, certainly, there are wealthy parents that have the means to abuse the system.
You think there is an epidemic of wealthy parents suing the school systems to get their non-autistic children autism services?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
And all parents of school aged children should care because providing supports is expensive, and pretty much all districts are suffering from massive budget cuts.
Kids will still need interventions, but the law doesn't create specified diagnoses--you're in a particular category and that's it:
http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedfiles/departments/ims/support/iep_disability_codes.pdf
That's how they wrote IDEA Rehabilitation Act in 1973.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
Maybe because the USA has a higher standard for children.
Anonymous wrote:I think part of this may have to do with the spectrum being so large, and the need to use the diagnosis to force insurance companies and schools systems to pay for the extra support these kids need (ex. therapy, additional support in classrooms).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/23/health/autism-misdiagnosis-rate/
It's good to see more mainstream media on this.
Wow, you're really out of the loop. The mainstream media isn't "on this." The report came out over a year ago:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/27/health/cdc-autism/
The "rise" in autism is tied to the 1973 FAPE legislation:
https://www.ted.com/talks/wendy_chung_autism_what_we_know_and_what_we_don_t_know_yet?language=en
We also get it. Please get over your kid's diagnosis or misdiagnosis. So no need to post pointless links.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This? This right here is why 1 in 68 kids have "autism" now in the US. But not in Canada or Germany or any other industrialized wealthy nation.
I could care less if ASD is over diagnosed as long as these kids are getting the help they need.
Maybe because the USA has a higher standard for children.
You think we have more higher standards than most of Western Europe and Canada and Australia? No. If we did, we'd have way more social services. We do, however, have a system where a parent can sue the school district to push for services. In some ways, that's a good thing, obviously. But, certainly, there are wealthy parents that have the means to abuse the system.
You think there is an epidemic of wealthy parents suing the school systems to get their non-autistic children autism services?![]()