Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay for private, OP. Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, no matter how much you don't like them.
Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, but not everyone is entitled to free access to a mainstream classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Goodness, there was a child like this years ago in my son's K class. He had a classroom aide, and was relatively calm in class, but would act unpredictably in corridors, at recess and pick-up time. This was MCPS. I requested that DS not be placed in the same classroom with him the year after and that was basically all I could do. The request was honored, BTW. He has outwardly calmed down somewhat now, but from a few disturbing incidents that have continued to happen, I am persuaded that he is truly psychotic. The only child I have ever met who seems to enjoy hurting others.
Or, a kid who gets really overwhelmed in crowded and unstructured situations like corridors, recess, and pick up. Jesus, lady.
I don't want to relate the disturbing incidents that happened recently because they happened to my younger daughter and they are particular enough to out me. My children's school is an inclusive one, and I have volunteered there for years - I see kids of all stripes and they all have a large solid core of human goodness.
Not this one.
So don't "Jesus, lady" me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay for private, OP. Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, no matter how much you don't like them.
No parent bashing. The parent has legitimate concerns about their child's safety in the classroom. First talk with teacher about concerns. Then talk with principal about concerns. Start there and see, what their response is. If you are still not satisfied, take it up the chain of command to head of schools, super, etc. Children should feel safe in classroom.
I'm not "parent bashing;" otherwise I'd have made fun of her precious "snowflake."
FAPE is the law: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/edlite-FAPE504.html
Children should feel safe in the classroom, but it's not a legal requirement. Allowing a kid access to an education is.
Anonymous wrote:Can the child's parents be held liable? That also night speed up getting them to consent not having the kid in a mainstream classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay for private, OP. Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, no matter how much you don't like them.
No parent bashing. The parent has legitimate concerns about their child's safety in the classroom. First talk with teacher about concerns. Then talk with principal about concerns. Start there and see, what their response is. If you are still not satisfied, take it up the chain of command to head of schools, super, etc. Children should feel safe in classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope this isn't Arlington.
Not the OP, but I have a similar situation in my DC's k class. I am new to Arlington. Tell me why you hope it isn't arlington. I am truly clueless and maybe your answer will help me figure out why my efforts to protect DC have fallen on deaf ears.
Anonymous wrote:I hope this isn't Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay for private, OP. Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, no matter how much you don't like them.
Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, but not everyone is entitled to free access to a mainstream classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Pay for private, OP. Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, no matter how much you don't like them.