Anonymous wrote:If you do this kind of thing (looking for scams), the entire thing made perfect sense -- if you're looking for people running scams trying to get themselves tax exempt, you look at newly-emerging issues that capture public attention. That is prime ground for scammers. Every major catastrophe and other world event leads to tons of unscrupulous people trying to cash in by preying on people who want to contribute to a cause by making fake or very, very suspect "charities".
So while it lead to "perceptions" as the report said, it really was just the IRS doing its job.
ooh you used a fancy name, which obviously makes it true.Anonymous wrote:You've never heard of the "modified limited hangout" before, eh? Standard damage control. Mistakes were made, but no individual did anything wrong. It's a cliche.
Anonymous wrote:You've never heard of the "modified limited hangout" before, eh? Standard damage control. Mistakes were made, but no individual did anything wrong. It's a cliche.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DOJ report gives us the truth.
The new republican political witch hunt gives republicans another opportunity to look idiotic before the country.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ms Lerner is as "inept" as Hillary.
Let's play the gender card.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DOJ report gives us the truth.
The new republican political witch hunt gives republicans another opportunity to look idiotic before the country.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ms Lerner is as "inept" as Hillary.
Let's play the gender card.
Anonymous wrote:The DOJ report gives us the truth.
The new republican political witch hunt gives republicans another opportunity to look idiotic before the country.
![]()
![]()
![]()
DOJ “found no evidence that any IRS official acted based on political, discriminatory, corrupt, or other inappropriate motives that would support a criminal prosecution.”... No IRS employee interviewed by the DOJ reported having any information suggesting actions were taken “with the purpose of harming or harassing applicants affiliated with the Tea Party or similar groups,” he stated. Even politically conservative employees who were critical of Lerner’s leadership and management style did not suspect their boss acted with political, discriminatory or corrupt purposes.
This was all a waste of money. Just a political attack.