Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 23:56     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:Educate yourself on the facts.
Try watching the awesome video that features Dr. Hardell and MCPS Chief of Tech.. Decide or yourself what is fact and what is belief.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8H8Eg6FFRc

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8H8Eg6FFRc


You mean this guy? He's not even taken seriously across the pond or the US.

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/1027#.VjLou47D_MJ
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 21:50     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
The post First US Public School District Limits Wi-Fi Radiation Exposure to Students and Staff details how the tide is turning. http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blogspot.com/2015/09/first-us-public-school-district-limits.html
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 21:34     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
The parent blog to learn more about this "crazy" issue is at http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blogspot.com
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 21:27     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Educate yourself on the facts.
Try watching the awesome video that features Dr. Hardell and MCPS Chief of Tech.. Decide or yourself what is fact and what is belief.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8H8Eg6FFRc

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8H8Eg6FFRc
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 13:41     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes it is similar and since you hold the cell phone directly against your head, and therefore an antenna right next to your head, the RF energy exposure is greater. Nuts have tried to say that cell phone use causes brain cancer but the epidemiology has never been proven. Don't you think as long as cell phones have been in use, if there was a causal relationship between RF energy and disfunction at a cellular level, something would have been discovered by now?

The other poster that said the routers were 200 times stronger is an incorrect. It's all RF range within a frequency band is between 2.4 and 5 Mhz for all routers, what makes a router industrial lies within the processor and software.


who are you in mcps? tofug? 200 number was correct. it says so right in the rfp.


I am certainly not with MCPS, in fact I have very little respect for MCPS and their ridiculous pseudo-curriculum or even the proliferation of chromebooks as a substitute for textbooks.

What is the unit of measurement you are using for stronger? Please provide the source of your information. What is an rfg?
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 13:35     Subject: Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:
Additional public meetings are scheduled in the Takoma Park schools at the end of October and the beginning of November. See below:

http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blogspot.com/2015/10/join-us-at-upcoming-information-meeting.html
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 12:35     Subject: Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:
Additional public meetings are scheduled in the Takoma Park schools at the end of October and the beginning of November. See below:

http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blogspot.com/2015/10/join-us-at-upcoming-information-meeting.html


Why does Takoma Park care?
Anonymous
Post 10/29/2015 10:55     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:Yes it is similar and since you hold the cell phone directly against your head, and therefore an antenna right next to your head, the RF energy exposure is greater. Nuts have tried to say that cell phone use causes brain cancer but the epidemiology has never been proven. Don't you think as long as cell phones have been in use, if there was a causal relationship between RF energy and disfunction at a cellular level, something would have been discovered by now?

The other poster that said the routers were 200 times stronger is an incorrect. It's all RF range within a frequency band is between 2.4 and 5 Mhz for all routers, what makes a router industrial lies within the processor and software.


who are you in mcps? tofug? 200 number was correct. it says so right in the rfp.
Anonymous
Post 10/28/2015 21:49     Subject: Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Please consider signing a petition:

https://www.change.org/p/montgomery-county-public-schools-immediately-explore-solutions-that-minimize-wireless-radiation-in-the-classrooms?recruiter=21186282&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2015 22:03     Subject: Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools

Additional public meetings are scheduled in the Takoma Park schools at the end of October and the beginning of November. See below:

http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blogspot.com/2015/10/join-us-at-upcoming-information-meeting.html
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2015 18:21     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Yes it is similar and since you hold the cell phone directly against your head, and therefore an antenna right next to your head, the RF energy exposure is greater. Nuts have tried to say that cell phone use causes brain cancer but the epidemiology has never been proven. Don't you think as long as cell phones have been in use, if there was a causal relationship between RF energy and disfunction at a cellular level, something would have been discovered by now?

The other poster that said the routers were 200 times stronger is an incorrect. It's all RF range within a frequency band is between 2.4 and 5 Mhz for all routers, what makes a router industrial lies within the processor and software.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2015 13:48     Subject: Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't everyone have wifi in their homes? How is this different? (real question)

Also, isn't there cell phone service everywhere, which is similar?
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2015 13:47     Subject: Re:Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bunch of nuts that don't know diddly about science or research.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1849947/



Bunch of nut teachers that don't know diddly about science or research.



Wireless radiation is emitted by the myriad of wireless devices we encounter every day. It was once thought to be relatively harmless. However, we now know that wireless radiation can cause non-thermal biological effects as well, including damage to cells and DNA, even at low levels.

Reducing Your Exposure to Wireless Radiation
Some tips to reduce your exposure to wireless radiation.

What You Need to Know About Wireless Radiation and Your Baby
Taking certain precautions around wireless radiation is appropriate for our most vulnerable populations, including pregnant women.

http://www.uft.org/our-rights/wireless-radiation

NP here. If that's true, and it isn't, everyone is screwed whatever they do, so there's no harm in putting in WiFi.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2015 02:40     Subject: Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't everyone have wifi in their homes? How is this different? (real question)


200 times what is in homes


Where is your proof? What unit of measurement exactly are you comparing in home verur commrrcial?

Anonymous
Post 10/23/2015 21:51     Subject: Safe Tech for Schools MCPS - Wireless Internet in Schools
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't everyone have wifi in their homes? How is this different? (real question)


Not the OP, but I understand that the wifi in schools will be much stronger than what would be found in your home.

FTR, I'm one of those people who turns off our wireless internet at night - for simple safety issues (hacking) and because I figure it doesn't hurt to have it turned off in case there is a slight chance of it being risky.