Anonymous wrote:How is your colleague's gender relevant in this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
If I say so myself -- I killedReally, presentation went really well. I just removed his content and thanked him for his collaboration.
Some of the comments here have been so interesting. I understand some of the feedback about my boss's original request of this guy basically being "asking a co-exec to do secretarial work." At the risk of too many details for this forum -- I, too, originally thought this was just an admin/IT thing -- and was surprised that another exec was asked (and was given the work.)
But, again, info I didn't include before: the whole point of this presentation was b/c this same exec had *excluded* me from another peer's presentation (that impacted my division) and I found out about it last week.
I suspect that my boss and this exec knew that this presentation needed to "match" up with that presentation…and they were caught-red-handed about not having gotten my participation/input on that presentation. I realized this when one of the exec's edits to *my* presentation was to link to that other presentation. I think it was a CYA on their part.
I think it was sleazy all around.
But, you know what, I edited my presentation back to what it needed to be…presented the hell out of it…rose about it all. Our CEO sat in unexpectedly…so all's well.
And…I'll keep a smile on my face with this exec (and my sneaky boss)…but my memory is long.
Congratulations OP! So glad to hear this!
Yay for outsmarting the office politics and sneakiness.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
If I say so myself -- I killedReally, presentation went really well. I just removed his content and thanked him for his collaboration.
Some of the comments here have been so interesting. I understand some of the feedback about my boss's original request of this guy basically being "asking a co-exec to do secretarial work." At the risk of too many details for this forum -- I, too, originally thought this was just an admin/IT thing -- and was surprised that another exec was asked (and was given the work.)
But, again, info I didn't include before: the whole point of this presentation was b/c this same exec had *excluded* me from another peer's presentation (that impacted my division) and I found out about it last week.
I suspect that my boss and this exec knew that this presentation needed to "match" up with that presentation…and they were caught-red-handed about not having gotten my participation/input on that presentation. I realized this when one of the exec's edits to *my* presentation was to link to that other presentation. I think it was a CYA on their part.
I think it was sleazy all around.
But, you know what, I edited my presentation back to what it needed to be…presented the hell out of it…rose about it all. Our CEO sat in unexpectedly…so all's well.
And…I'll keep a smile on my face with this exec (and my sneaky boss)…but my memory is long.
Anonymous wrote:I could really use some advice. Little background: my co-worker and I are both exec. level professionals -- our subject matter areas interact but are not the same. This guy is considered a "great guy" by our CEO and he has basically only ever worked at this company. He has not been helpful in any way to me since I joined (about a year ago) -- which is fine…but may be instructive.
I have worked on an major presentation (in my subject area expertise) and am set to present it to, among others, this co-worker's division.
In my organization, there is a "template" style presentation slide deck that all presentations are supposed to conform to. I don't have access to that template, etc., so I was asked (by my boss) to send it to my co-worker who "would put it into the right format." Well, he kept it for 3 days and I got it back last night at 11pm!! (Presentation is at noon today, by the way.)
Well, I open up the slide deck this morning and discover that he has made some changes to my presentation(!) without ever discussing them with me. There aren't many changes and they are not substantive or material…but they are also not things I would have inserted. This just seems like an obnoxious overstepping and pretty unprofessional.
What's worse, he changed the title page to say "materials complied by" [his name] and [my name]!! This has just infuriated me. I have worked on this presentation for months and it is my area. I am told to send my presentation to him for what I was led to believe would be an admin/tech process of fitting it into the correct slide deck…but now, his name is on the presentation *as if* we've been collaborating on this thing substantively.
What would you do? Any advice…again, I'm presenting at noon.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
If I say so myself -- I killedReally, presentation went really well. I just removed his content and thanked him for his collaboration.
Some of the comments here have been so interesting. I understand some of the feedback about my boss's original request of this guy basically being "asking a co-exec to do secretarial work." At the risk of too many details for this forum -- I, too, originally thought this was just an admin/IT thing -- and was surprised that another exec was asked (and was given the work.)
But, again, info I didn't include before: the whole point of this presentation was b/c this same exec had *excluded* me from another peer's presentation (that impacted my division) and I found out about it last week.
I suspect that my boss and this exec knew that this presentation needed to "match" up with that presentation…and they were caught-red-handed about not having gotten my participation/input on that presentation. I realized this when one of the exec's edits to *my* presentation was to link to that other presentation. I think it was a CYA on their part.
I think it was sleazy all around.
But, you know what, I edited my presentation back to what it needed to be…presented the hell out of it…rose about it all. Our CEO sat in unexpectedly…so all's well.
And…I'll keep a smile on my face with this exec (and my sneaky boss)…but my memory is long.