Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is mean-looking, pro-business, dishonest (sorry for being redundant), criminal, conservative plutocrats.
Seems like she has a razor thin constituency in a crowded field vying for those same voters.
I don't see the broad appeal needed to win a national election. She couldn't even cut it in a state race in California.
I hope republicans continue to pile chips onto her candidacy. It will be a money black hole.
![]()
![]()
![]()
She wants to chip away at the Hillary votes and break the glass ceiling. She's betting on women who want a woman president, but not another Clinton.
Anonymous wrote:Upper-middle-class, educated (read: big donor) republicans. I have a hard time seeing her gain traction with the blue-collar born-again types.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:The establishment is using her to undermine Trump.
There is no way that they would want Fiorina as the nominee.
Bingo. Fiorina is the political equivalent of a suicide bomber. She is simply supposed to take out Trump and make room for someone more acceptable to the establishment. The fact that the mainstream media so completely fell into line should demonstrate to everyone that the mainstream press is neither conservative nor liberal. It is simply a mouthpiece for the ruling class.
Her rise in the press also suggests that many in the MSM are not all that smart.
Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?
Who is making fun of her? I'm actually impressed with the way she threw Trump's "face" comment back at him. She's a good actress.
I'm just really shocked (not) that the same liberals who scream about women's rights as well as discrimination about looks, sex, and other physical attributes are so quick to participate
Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?
Anonymous wrote:The establishment is using her to undermine Trump.
There is no way that they would want Fiorina as the nominee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?
Who is making fun of her? I'm actually impressed with the way she threw Trump's "face" comment back at him. She's a good actress.
I'm just really shocked (not) that the same liberals who scream about women's rights as well as discrimination about looks, sex, and other physical attributes are so quick to participate
Anonymous wrote:I think her disastrous tenure at HP hurts her standing with people who actually know anything about business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?
Who is making fun of her? I'm actually impressed with the way she threw Trump's "face" comment back at him. She's a good actress.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is mean-looking, pro-business, dishonest (sorry for being redundant), criminal, conservative plutocrats.
Seems like she has a razor thin constituency in a crowded field vying for those same voters.
I don't see the broad appeal needed to win a national election. She couldn't even cut it in a state race in California.
I hope republicans continue to pile chips onto her candidacy. It will be a money black hole.
![]()
![]()
![]()
She wants to chip away at the Hillary votes and break the glass ceiling. She's betting on women who want a woman president, but not another Clinton.
Anonymous wrote:I think it is mean-looking, pro-business, dishonest (sorry for being redundant), criminal, conservative plutocrats.
Seems like she has a razor thin constituency in a crowded field vying for those same voters.
I don't see the broad appeal needed to win a national election. She couldn't even cut it in a state race in California.
I hope republicans continue to pile chips onto her candidacy. It will be a money black hole.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:So now we are going after Fiorina? Who else do liberals make fun of next?