Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me it would depend on if he was intervening in an active assault or was he reacting to something that had already occurred?
It makes no difference to me. He was the one there, the one experiencing everything around him, the one who knew what had happened, the one who had to deal with this distraught mother, and the one who knew the only way to deal with this horrible monster. He also has to live the rest of his life with all of the crap he has seen. I don't second guess him for a minute. We should be so fortunate to have men like him in our midst. If he wants to serve us, please let him!
Would you have the same opinion if it was a police officer that did the same thing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me it would depend on if he was intervening in an active assault or was he reacting to something that had already occurred?
It makes no difference to me. He was the one there, the one experiencing everything around him, the one who knew what had happened, the one who had to deal with this distraught mother, and the one who knew the only way to deal with this horrible monster. He also has to live the rest of his life with all of the crap he has seen. I don't second guess him for a minute. We should be so fortunate to have men like him in our midst. If he wants to serve us, please let him!
Would you have the same opinion if it was a police officer that did the same thing?
Anonymous wrote:For me it would depend on if he was intervening in an active assault or was he reacting to something that had already occurred?
It makes no difference to me. He was the one there, the one experiencing everything around him, the one who knew what had happened, the one who had to deal with this distraught mother, and the one who knew the only way to deal with this horrible monster. He also has to live the rest of his life with all of the crap he has seen. I don't second guess him for a minute. We should be so fortunate to have men like him in our midst. If he wants to serve us, please let him!
Anonymous wrote:There is a Congressman looking into this - I'll look for more details to post so you can voice your support. Meanwhile in France its being reported off duty American servicemen subdue a gunman on a.train. Hope they don't get in trouble for 'knocking him down''. Go Marines!
For me it would depend on if he was intervening in an active assault or was he reacting to something that had already occurred?
Anonymous wrote:http://original.antiwar.com/vlahos/2010/04/12/a-deal-with-the-devil/
This is one of many articles - please dont question the source. I dont have time to do an exhaustive internet search for a completely neutral source - again, there are many.
Sorry - not tea boys . Dancing boys ('bacha bazi).
Talk about the irony in going after campus rape here but firing a decorated war hero for confronting it there.
Anonymous wrote:Dumb question, but didn't the Afghan commanders serve as dancing boys at one point?
Not defending this twisted circle of life, but it should be noted that those they're partnering with grew up in a some similarly horrific conditions.
It's not like the commander went ROTC at Afghan U.
Anonymous wrote:Dumb question, but didn't the Afghan commanders serve as dancing boys at one point?
Not defending this twisted circle of life, but it should be noted that those they're partnering with grew up in a some similarly horrific conditions.
It's not like the commander went ROTC at Afghan U.
Anonymous wrote:Dumb question, but didn't the Afghan commanders serve as dancing boys at one point?
Not defending this twisted circle of life, but it should be noted that those they're partnering with grew up in a some similarly horrific conditions.
It's not like the commander went ROTC at Afghan U.