Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I curious why the semantics matter to you so much.
My dd is a vegetarian, although she likes the occasional hamburger. LOL.
She is not a vegetarian. She or you can call her that if it makes you feel better, but it is not true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Met someone who said this recently. When you think "meat," do you only think red meat, or all animal meat?
I've never understood the disassociation of fish/chicken as meat - is it cultural?
If you don't think of fish/chicken as "meat," where were you raised? To me, meat = all animal flesh. Red, white, seafood, whatever. And if you eat seafood, you're not vegetarian.
It is an older cooking classification. I have an old cookbook that has a section for meat, fowl and fish.

Anonymous wrote:Met someone who said this recently. When you think "meat," do you only think red meat, or all animal meat?
I've never understood the disassociation of fish/chicken as meat - is it cultural?
If you don't think of fish/chicken as "meat," where were you raised? To me, meat = all animal flesh. Red, white, seafood, whatever. And if you eat seafood, you're not vegetarian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I curious why the semantics matter to you so much.
My dd is a vegetarian, although she likes the occasional hamburger. LOL.
That's a flexitarian. I'm one.
That is ridiculous. That is simply a healthy diet.
How is that ridiculous?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meat is kind of synonymous with red meat ,I.e beef, pork, ham etc. There are large populations for whom the definition of meat is only restricted to fish and chicken, with no red meat. I know people who enjoy fish or chicken but abhor red meat.
That's why they are quick to clarify.
I get that, but WHY is there a distinction? Is it a cultural/historical thing for some populations?
Anonymous wrote:Meat is kind of synonymous with red meat ,I.e beef, pork, ham etc. There are large populations for whom the definition of meat is only restricted to fish and chicken, with no red meat. I know people who enjoy fish or chicken but abhor red meat.
That's why they are quick to clarify.
Anonymous wrote:Met someone who said this recently. When you think "meat," do you only think red meat, or all animal meat?
I've never understood the disassociation of fish/chicken as meat - is it cultural?
If you don't think of fish/chicken as "meat," where were you raised? To me, meat = all animal flesh. Red, white, seafood, whatever. And if you eat seafood, you're not vegetarian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I curious why the semantics matter to you so much.
My dd is a vegetarian, although she likes the occasional hamburger. LOL.
That's a flexitarian. I'm one.
That is ridiculous. That is simply a healthy diet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I curious why the semantics matter to you so much.
My dd is a vegetarian, although she likes the occasional hamburger. LOL.
That's a flexitarian. I'm one.