Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Yes
I was being flippant...but truly do you think a multiple choice test measures mastery? Creativity?
How about we get rid of the SAT, ACT, SAT IIs, APs, GPA all objective measures and only go with essays, activities and interviews etc. Doesn't matter anyway, colleges admit whoever they want to admit. Lets stop pretending.
Of course colleges admit whoever they want to. Is anyone pretending otherwise? And why shouldn't private colleges admit who they want?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I knew it was going to be written by an asian or indian american.
low and behold, i scrolled down to the end and it's an indian american.
surprise surprise.
Squeeky wheel gets the grease!
Squeeky wheel should take the red bus
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I knew it was going to be written by an asian or indian american.
low and behold, i scrolled down to the end and it's an indian american.
surprise surprise.
Squeeky wheel gets the grease!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Yes
I was being flippant...but truly do you think a multiple choice test measures mastery? Creativity?
How about we get rid of the SAT, ACT, SAT IIs, APs, GPA all objective measures and only go with essays, activities and interviews etc. Doesn't matter anyway, colleges admit whoever they want to admit. Lets stop pretending.
Of course colleges admit whoever they want to. Is anyone pretending otherwise? And why shouldn't private colleges admit who they want?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Yes
I was being flippant...but truly do you think a multiple choice test measures mastery? Creativity?
How about we get rid of the SAT, ACT, SAT IIs, APs, GPA all objective measures and only go with essays, activities and interviews etc. Doesn't matter anyway, colleges admit whoever they want to admit. Lets stop pretending.
Of course colleges admit whoever they want to. Is anyone pretending otherwise? And why shouldn't private colleges admit who they want?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Yes
I was being flippant...but truly do you think a multiple choice test measures mastery? Creativity?
How about we get rid of the SAT, ACT, SAT IIs, APs, GPA all objective measures and only go with essays, activities and interviews etc. Doesn't matter anyway, colleges admit whoever they want to admit. Lets stop pretending.
Anonymous wrote:Holistic can ALSO mean looking beyond GPA perfection - if stellar scores, essays and recommendations and ECs suggest that a kid is really special and smart with lots of untapped potential, the school may take a risk here and there on a wild card applicant. All perfect scores and grades does not automatically make for an interesting applicant - that is my read at least on the "holistic" approach. A holistic approach makes no excuses for looking at the total package in each kid as it relates to the class as a whole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Yes
I was being flippant...but truly do you think a multiple choice test measures mastery? Creativity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Yes
I was being flippant...but truly do you think a multiple choice test measures mastery? Creativity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Yes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Discrimination by any other name is still discrimination.
It isn't discrimination to look beyond test scores because it's been demonstrated time and again that test scores have more to do with family income and parents' education than anything else. Even there, the scores aren't all that accurate because if they were you wouldn't get a different score every time you took the test. This is why the College Board now reports SAT scores as ranges rather than exact numbers.
Are you implying Asian students bring NOTHING but test scores? They are so one dimensional they bring nothing else?
Anonymous wrote:Can somebody please explain why people are automatically waving the discrimination flag around this term? Rightly or wrongly the process requires that these kids jump through hoops in terms of multiple admission requirements and assessments so that the admissions peeps can judge the "whole package". Any process that factors personality and "fit" is not exact. The process must either be completely impersonal and robotic or a crap shoot. It has been this way for years - so why is this term so offensive all of a sudden?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holistic admission = legalized discrimination
Holistic admission = Illegal discrimination