Anonymous wrote:Just b/c it's a trace amount and just b/c it's not proven to cause "problems" does NOT mean it's safe. It just means it's not regulated. But that's exactly what the manufacturers want you to think. These things build up in our system over time. Why does everyone know someone who has or has had cancer???? Was it as prevalent 200 years ago? The answer is no.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's better to be safe than sorry. After all, the Romans didn't think anything of all the lead water pipes they were using...they just didn't know that they were slowly poisoning themselves and their kids. I sometimes feel like we're doing the same thing with all the plastic/chemically stuff out there. After all, there wasn't so much plastic/chemical-filled stuff when our grandparents were raising our own parents. It's just the generations since (basically us and onward) who have been exposed. God knows how much cancer we'll be getting later in life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I totally get your point and am not normally an alarmist, but now I'm really scared about Johnson's Baby Shampoo.Anonymous wrote:So we are now worrying about BPA in #7 organic Gerber baby food containers/formula containers, toxins in pressed woods, jet fuel in water and formula, cancer causing ingredients in baby products (including but not limited to shampoo and sunscreen) that have been used for years and whether or not we use all organic fruits & veggies!!!!
Yet we put our kids in cabs with no car seats and let them wander the neighborhood!
"Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you."
I get your point, but yes, some of these shampoos do contain ingredients that are either toxic or carcinogenic in certain amounts. It practically takes a chemist to understand what the true risk is, since one side says everything is fine and the other that the world is ending. I wish a real, down to earth chemist could put this in perspective of what really matters.
Until that time, I'm sticking with anything rated a 2 or under on the EWG site. Hello, California Baby!
Anonymous wrote:Johnson's is fine. There are groups that want to put the fear of God in you about "toxins". The truth is, they too often react out of an emtional and not scientific perspective. Take a previous post that says shampoos contain formaldehyde. Yes, some do contain trace amounts. But you breathe in comparatively so much more that your shampoo is a minute fraction. And your body produces and eliminates formaldehyde every day of your life. So yes, formaldehyde can be bad for you in large quantities. But the tiny amount in shampoo does not matter to your health. The same goes for many of the other "toxins" out there.
Anonymous wrote:I totally get your point and am not normally an alarmist, but now I'm really scared about Johnson's Baby Shampoo.Anonymous wrote:So we are now worrying about BPA in #7 organic Gerber baby food containers/formula containers, toxins in pressed woods, jet fuel in water and formula, cancer causing ingredients in baby products (including but not limited to shampoo and sunscreen) that have been used for years and whether or not we use all organic fruits & veggies!!!!
Yet we put our kids in cabs with no car seats and let them wander the neighborhood!
Anonymous wrote:We use Weleda shampoo.