Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a contrary opinion, we were told at the alcohol and drug seminars at our kids' schools to not allow kids to try alcohol at home when they are young. The educators leading the seminar said that research shows that the longer you delay the first sip of alcohol, the first time a kid tries drugs, and the first time they have sex, the healthier they will be as adults.
Obviously, people have been plenty of evidence to the contrary but we've followed that advice about not giving sips of alcohol at home and our teens have not been wild -- at least not yet! (This was also the rule in my house growing up and I didn't have any trouble in college or beyond with alcohol.)
I think you misunderstood "try" alcohol at home as actually drink, not have a taste.
Sure the longer you delay actual drinking the better, having a taste does not count as drinking.
No, I didn't misunderstand -- parents providing tastes or sips of alcohol to children is linked with unhealthy drinking in teens. See the CNN link provided by another pp. Also, I'm not naive enough to think that my kids won't ever drink as teens, especially when they go to college. I'm saying that we won't provide any alcohol to our children until they are 21 and we tell them that we hope they do not drink until they are at least out of high school.
Anonymous wrote:Just a contrary opinion, we were told at the alcohol and drug seminars at our kids' schools to not allow kids to try alcohol at home when they are young. The educators leading the seminar said that research shows that the longer you delay the first sip of alcohol, the first time a kid tries drugs, and the first time they have sex, the healthier they will be as adults.
Obviously, people have been plenty of evidence to the contrary but we've followed that advice about not giving sips of alcohol at home and our teens have not been wild -- at least not yet! (This was also the rule in my house growing up and I didn't have any trouble in college or beyond with alcohol.)
Anonymous wrote:No alcohol til 21. Most emerging studies show allowing sips at home increases the likelihood of problems down the road.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/31/living/feat-sipping-alcohol-kids-drinking-impact-parents/
http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0390-answering-questions-about-underage-drinking
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42807670/ns/health-childrens_health/t/letting-teen-drink-under-parents-watch-backfires/#.VbOXXPlViko
Anonymous wrote:Just a contrary opinion, we were told at the alcohol and drug seminars at our kids' schools to not allow kids to try alcohol at home when they are young. The educators leading the seminar said that research shows that the longer you delay the first sip of alcohol, the first time a kid tries drugs, and the first time they have sex, the healthier they will be as adults.
Obviously, people have been plenty of evidence to the contrary but we've followed that advice about not giving sips of alcohol at home and our teens have not been wild -- at least not yet! (This was also the rule in my house growing up and I didn't have any trouble in college or beyond with alcohol.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a contrary opinion, we were told at the alcohol and drug seminars at our kids' schools to not allow kids to try alcohol at home when they are young. The educators leading the seminar said that research shows that the longer you delay the first sip of alcohol, the first time a kid tries drugs, and the first time they have sex, the healthier they will be as adults.
Obviously, people have been plenty of evidence to the contrary but we've followed that advice about not giving sips of alcohol at home and our teens have not been wild -- at least not yet! (This was also the rule in my house growing up and I didn't have any trouble in college or beyond with alcohol.)
That sounds incredibly naive...do you know for sure your teens haven't had sex, tried pot etc just because you haven't let them have a sip of wine?? This is the same argument as teach abstinence, kids won't have sex. If that worked, the U.S would have a much smaller percentage of teen pregnancy than Western Europe where they have comprehensive sex education and diluted wine with dinner. Also, if this worked fewer American teens would die in alcohol induced car accidents...but hey, just because it worked for you and maybe for your kids, you must be right.
Anonymous wrote:One consideration. Are your parents teetotalers only because they disapprove of alcohol or are they teetotalers because their parents were drunks? Sounds from your post like it's the former but if it's the latter then your kids might be at risk for addiction because of their genetic heritage. That doesn't mean you shouldn't let them drink, just that you should make them aware of the family history and that they need to monitor their use.
Anonymous wrote:My parents similarly never drank or went anywhere where there was alcohol. It was simply absent from my childhood. I tried wine abroad where it was legal to do so and then began drinking in moderation here after I turned 21.
I thought giving my then-young children a sip of wine when they asked would cure them of their interest, but my 3yo liked itGiven the current research, we're holding the when-it's-legal line. They, of course, have a blanket call-us-for-any-hint-of-trouble rule, too.
Given the current research, we're holding the when-it's-legal line. They, of course, have a blanket call-us-for-any-hint-of-trouble rule, too. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a contrary opinion, we were told at the alcohol and drug seminars at our kids' schools to not allow kids to try alcohol at home when they are young. The educators leading the seminar said that research shows that the longer you delay the first sip of alcohol, the first time a kid tries drugs, and the first time they have sex, the healthier they will be as adults.
Obviously, people have been plenty of evidence to the contrary but we've followed that advice about not giving sips of alcohol at home and our teens have not been wild -- at least not yet! (This was also the rule in my house growing up and I didn't have any trouble in college or beyond with alcohol.)
I think you misunderstood "try" alcohol at home as actually drink, not have a taste.
Sure the longer you delay actual drinking the better, having a taste does not count as drinking.
Anonymous wrote:Just a contrary opinion, we were told at the alcohol and drug seminars at our kids' schools to not allow kids to try alcohol at home when they are young. The educators leading the seminar said that research shows that the longer you delay the first sip of alcohol, the first time a kid tries drugs, and the first time they have sex, the healthier they will be as adults.
Obviously, people have been plenty of evidence to the contrary but we've followed that advice about not giving sips of alcohol at home and our teens have not been wild -- at least not yet! (This was also the rule in my house growing up and I didn't have any trouble in college or beyond with alcohol.)
Anonymous wrote:No alcohol til 21. Most emerging studies show allowing sips at home increases the likelihood of problems down the road.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/31/living/feat-sipping-alcohol-kids-drinking-impact-parents/
http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0390-answering-questions-about-underage-drinking
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42807670/ns/health-childrens_health/t/letting-teen-drink-under-parents-watch-backfires/#.VbOXXPlViko