Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here: to the PPs saying that inexcusable behavior by the other party justifies this, I'm sorry but I disagree. Unless your healthy or safety is threatened by doing so, you should communicate your intention to cut off contact. As the old saying goes, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
My former best friend made a pass at my wife. I haven't spoken to him since. You really think I should give him the time of day?
Anonymous wrote:I dated a guy for almost 15 months. Granted, not exclusively. Then he texted me, "I'm about done." and never responded to me again. Didn't even call or come see me in person to dump me. Coward!
Anonymous wrote:OP here: to the PPs saying that inexcusable behavior by the other party justifies this, I'm sorry but I disagree. Unless your healthy or safety is threatened by doing so, you should communicate your intention to cut off contact. As the old saying goes, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Anonymous wrote: This is pretty much how most men in their 20s end their relationships. I'm 40 years old and remember this happening 15, 20 years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Some folks think that they are entitled to an "explanation" for why the guy that went on two dates with her is not interested. This is unrealistic.
I think it's OK to ghost if the relationship was short, non-exclusive and you don't have any other relationship with that person. At that stage, no one owes anyone anything.
I think it's bizarre to ghost after a long-term, exclusive relationship. I am honestly skeptical of people who claim that this happened to them. People don't usually ust disappear out of the blue. There was probably SOMETHING that happened that either offended or upset the ghoster.
Anonymous wrote:I dated a guy for almost 15 months. Granted, not exclusively. Then he texted me, "I'm about done." and never responded to me again. Didn't even call or come see me in person to dump me. Coward!
Anonymous wrote:I dated a guy for almost 15 months. Granted, not exclusively. Then he texted me, "I'm about done." and never responded to me again. Didn't even call or come see me in person to dump me. Coward![/quote/]
Yeah, we've all been there. It's called he's an ass.
ghosting is a term for those hip millenials...they can now have tons of buzzfeed articles about it.
What's worse...giving shade, or ghosting?
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand what you are saying, OP, but I do think there are some instances when it is appropriate. In the book "The Gift of Fear" the author explains that for some disturbed individuals, ANY contact, ANY acknowledgement, even if it is "I do not like you anymore, please do not contact me." Is interpreted as a sign to continue to try to engage with the person.
In these cases, "ghosting" probably isn't the best term to use, as we are really talking about defending/protecting oneself from a stalker/abuser, but I do think there are some instances where absolutely zero contact is the way to go.
OP again - in case I wasn't clear I am absolutely excluding situations where health and safety are at risk, and I don't have an opinion the particulars regarding Theron & Penn. It was more the attitude that just disappearing on someone in general barring those kinds of extenuating circumstances could ever be OK. Personally I don't think the 'it's only been a few dates so I'll just disappear' is acceptable either. Grow up and just communicate that directly.
Anonymous wrote:I understand what you are saying, OP, but I do think there are some instances when it is appropriate. In the book "The Gift of Fear" the author explains that for some disturbed individuals, ANY contact, ANY acknowledgement, even if it is "I do not like you anymore, please do not contact me." Is interpreted as a sign to continue to try to engage with the person.
In these cases, "ghosting" probably isn't the best term to use, as we are really talking about defending/protecting oneself from a stalker/abuser, but I do think there are some instances where absolutely zero contact is the way to go.