Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I know what can happen when a child's ribcage is crushed by an airbag, teens don't sit in the front seat until they are learning to drive unless there isn't enough room in the back. Even with lack of room, I still wouldn't have a child under 13 in the front, or a teen who didn't meet the minimum recommended height and weight.
Boy, terrible idea, helicopter parent! You learn a lot about driving by sitting in the FRONT!
Anonymous wrote:I've always thought age limits were ridiculous - it should be based solely on weight and height. Same with the whole rear-facing infant seats. The recommendation is rear-facing until age 2, but our kids were always far too big to remain rear-facing after about a year. They were just big babies and it made no sense to try and squeeze them in backwards, so we turned them around at that point. Age means nothing - it's size that is important.
Anonymous wrote:
My son was sitting in the front seat regularly by 11 years old. Most of his friends started at 10.
Nobody but the DCUM follows these strict car seat "rules" -- that are really only guidelines.
Anonymous wrote:Because I know what can happen when a child's ribcage is crushed by an airbag, teens don't sit in the front seat until they are learning to drive unless there isn't enough room in the back. Even with lack of room, I still wouldn't have a child under 13 in the front, or a teen who didn't meet the minimum recommended height and weight.
Anonymous wrote:My 11yo is 5'3" and over 100 lbs. he is bigger than his physician so he sits in front if he wants to.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was 5'3" at 12 and wore a 8.5 shoe. How can that be too small for an airbag?
Sounds like you were big enough. The guidance is at least 5' tall and I forget if there's a weight minimum. I sat in the front seat in the 80s, as did my brother, but neither of us would qualify today.
Age is a requirement too because of bone density, that's why the minimum is 13 years despite height and weight.