Anonymous wrote:This is 100% dependent on the student. I went to Big State School and had a great experience. I learned a ton, developed close relationships with my professors, and graduated without debt. This allowed me the freedom to apply to my (top-ranked) graduate program of choice without worrying about my debt load.
But...some kids need more hand-holding or help finding their peer group. Or they need to have their peer group curated for them and need small class to avoid being overlooked. SLACs are great for that.
I TA'd at a highly competitive liberal arts college and their was absolutely more support. But the best kids were no better than the best kids at my Big State School.
If you feel like your kid will find the other smart, motivated, kids and has the personality to avoid getting lost in a crowd, I think it's a fine choice. Even a great choice, because it leaves some other options open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not "bad" per se, it's just different than privates. Privates have more resources and more hand-holdings. Public schools are "sink or swim" mode which forces kids to go out and actively look for what they need to survive.
To me, that's a great reason to go to a state school. It sounds like it prepares you more for the real world that a college graduate will be quickly entering.
Anonymous wrote:Many parent who went to state schools themselves prefer state schools for their children (and not because of the cost)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think I'm an outlier but I think state colleges are a fine choice. I think a lot of 'top' colleges are a huge waste of money for most people but yet they think they need to go to the ' right' college or else their future is going to be ruined forever, when in reality, does it even matter that much?
Agree. I think the only people concerned about this kind of thing live in areas like DC and NY. The rest of the country is just fine with sending their kids to state schools. There are some excellent ones out there.
I would recommend publics to anyone based on my experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think I'm an outlier but I think state colleges are a fine choice. I think a lot of 'top' colleges are a huge waste of money for most people but yet they think they need to go to the ' right' college or else their future is going to be ruined forever, when in reality, does it even matter that much?
Agree. I think the only people concerned about this kind of thing live in areas like DC and NY. The rest of the country is just fine with sending their kids to state schools. There are some excellent ones out there.
+1
The big state schools often have strong alumni networks, as good as if not better than the "top" colleges, and allow a student to be debt-free starting their career.
+1. As luck would have it, I have the same foreign policy government job as people who went to "better" schools. I also got to have the time of my life at my big, wonderful state school with no debt. But I don't judge either way. People do what is right for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think I'm an outlier but I think state colleges are a fine choice. I think a lot of 'top' colleges are a huge waste of money for most people but yet they think they need to go to the ' right' college or else their future is going to be ruined forever, when in reality, does it even matter that much?
Agree. I think the only people concerned about this kind of thing live in areas like DC and NY. The rest of the country is just fine with sending their kids to state schools. There are some excellent ones out there.
+1
The big state schools often have strong alumni networks, as good as if not better than the "top" colleges, and allow a student to be debt-free starting their career.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The top SLACs will do fine, but there's a broad range of small private LACs that are expensive and increasingly uncompetitive with state schools.
I agree -- I'm trying to figure out which ones those are so we can stay away.
Anonymous wrote:This is 100% dependent on the student. I went to Big State School and had a great experience. I learned a ton, developed close relationships with my professors, and graduated without debt. This allowed me the freedom to apply to my (top-ranked) graduate program of choice without worrying about my debt load.
But...some kids need more hand-holding or help finding their peer group. Or they need to have their peer group curated for them and need small class to avoid being overlooked. SLACs are great for that.
I TA'd at a highly competitive liberal arts college and their was absolutely more support. But the best kids were no better than the best kids at my Big State School.
If you feel like your kid will find the other smart, motivated, kids and has the personality to avoid getting lost in a crowd, I think it's a fine choice. Even a great choice, because it leaves some other options open.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing wrong with state schools. But if your child is an academically elite student with no interest in D1 sports or Greek life, they may be very poor fits. The fact of the matter is that 98% of high school students will never be in the running for the Ivies so the question is moot. Financially, nearly every family earning less than $200k will pay less at the Ivies because of much better financial aid. The important thing is for our children to choose a school that gives them the best chance to grow up and pursue their aspirations.