Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It has been my experience as a software engineer that most projects outsourced to foreign companies have had disastrous results. The contractors don't seem to have the skills to perform the job and they don't have the personal and professional dedication to see the project succeed. IT is the worst because someone who works for another company could not care less that the network is down for days at a time. It's not their bottom line that is at risk.
Then why do companies keep hiring them? I'm asking genuinely. I'm assuming the answer would be "to save money" but if it's not working well, then why do it?
Anonymous wrote:It has been my experience as a software engineer that most projects outsourced to foreign companies have had disastrous results. The contractors don't seem to have the skills to perform the job and they don't have the personal and professional dedication to see the project succeed. IT is the worst because someone who works for another company could not care less that the network is down for days at a time. It's not their bottom line that is at risk.
Anonymous wrote:Instead of the popular myth of migrant workers coming to take jobs from US citizens the fact is corporations are recruiting migrants to come take jobs from Americans. Perhaps it's time to stop blaming migrants/ immigrants and start pointing the finger at American corporations.
Anonymous wrote:^^ I don't actually think that, but I wanted to get the point across that you shouldn't just be straight up racist towards an entire group of people.^^
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh man. People should boycott. Haven't we learned our lesson from outsourcing jobs to India. Nothing is more annoying than getting an Indian guy when you have computer problems or getting an Indian to book an airline ticket.
Please boycott your computer (if you use windows - microsoft 'outsourced' their CEO job in your view, right?)?
Please boycott all pepsi products (since they 'outsourced' their ceo job)
Please boycott all mastercard cards (since they 'outsourced' their ceo job)
Please boycott google (since they 'outsourced' the mature product chief job)
Anonymous wrote:It's one thing to say: US citizens who are qualified for a competitive job deserve better chances of employment at a US company than similarly qualified immigrants.
It's a whole 'other thing to say "those obviously qualified immigrants are actually not qualified and I say that because I hate their race and THAT'S why Americans should be employed at said company!"
The fucking morons ITT.
Anonymous wrote:Oh man. People should boycott. Haven't we learned our lesson from outsourcing jobs to India. Nothing is more annoying than getting an Indian guy when you have computer problems or getting an Indian to book an airline ticket.
\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, people voted Congress in so we get the government we deserve. Corporations care more about money than US citizens. What do you expect?
Corporations legal responsibility is to their shareholders, to increase profits. Its a bummer when our free-economy benefits other countries.
Anonymous wrote:This is all over, and it's a disgrace. It's also technically illegal, but no one cares since there are no consequences. This is also legalized age discrimination since - as with Disney - many of the displaced are older workers. Meanwhile, their young poorly paid replacements will be worked to death - without overtime, since they will be classified as 'managers'. Personally, I think this is short-sighted on the part of the corporations. Many foreign workers have decent communication skills, but many do not. This can cause real problems. Anyone who tried accessing the first iteration of the Obamacare website saw this firsthand.
You can and should boycott Disney, but this is really the fault of our craven politicians who support the corporate fiction that there aren't enough qualified American workers to do these jobs.