Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I already posted in other thread. It's to accommodate kids from CAPCS which was pk3-1 so for each grade those kids are moving into they are adding an extra class, hence no pk3 bc pk3 doesn't need to absorb any new students.
Ok, that makes sense. Thank you for explaining. So this is confirmed that they are absorbing some of those kids? Are you a current parent? This is really nice of DCB if this is true. Makes me like the school even more.
More like a business decision although most think it was a win-win. This was part of a deal that gave the displaced families an option and got DCB permanent space. Whether those families wanted bilingual education and how many are enrolling will be interesting to see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I already posted in other thread. It's to accommodate kids from CAPCS which was pk3-1 so for each grade those kids are moving into they are adding an extra class, hence no pk3 bc pk3 doesn't need to absorb any new students.
Ok, that makes sense. Thank you for explaining. So this is confirmed that they are absorbing some of those kids? Are you a current parent? This is really nice of DCB if this is true. Makes me like the school even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I already posted in other thread. It's to accommodate kids from CAPCS which was pk3-1 so for each grade those kids are moving into they are adding an extra class, hence no pk3 bc pk3 doesn't need to absorb any new students.
Ok, that makes sense. Thank you for explaining. So this is confirmed that they are absorbing some of those kids? Are you a current parent? This is really nice of DCB if this is true. Makes me like the school even more.
Anonymous wrote:I already posted in other thread. It's to accommodate kids from CAPCS which was pk3-1 so for each grade those kids are moving into they are adding an extra class, hence no pk3 bc pk3 doesn't need to absorb any new students.
Anonymous wrote:23:40 I am right there praying with you. I wonder why they would only do PK4-whatever and not 3, assuming they do it at all.
Anonymous wrote:Press conference is on!

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i moved 17 spots and was wondering if this was unusual. still rather high up on the WL though.
We moved only 9 spots -- this is PK3.
pp here - yep! same pk3
That's so strange, does anyone know why these two WL moved different # of spots for the same grade (PK3) and same school? One moved 9 spots and one moved 17?
Thanks for your time everyone!
pp again - very strange indeed.
i was 117 and now 100 - ranked them #2 does that have something to do with it?