Anonymous wrote:Adding 'radical and 'terrorist' to the OP is superflous.
All christians are inherently both.
After all, what's what most think about muslims.
Anonymous wrote:SMH...
Further proof that "news" is not objective information about recent events or happenings. "News" is selective information for entertainment purposes. If the roles were reversed and this was a Muslim guy planning a similar attack on Christians it would be the lead story and front page material of every media outlet in the country. A Muslim extremist trying to tear some shit up here in the New York?
"Oh hell yeah gimmie that news that's entertainment!!"
But no, it was just some nutjob white guy who wanted to attack a Muslim community in New York.
"Eh, who cares no need for anyone to report on it that's not entertainment."
Damn shame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, this again? My god, I'm sure the Bandidos and Cossacks in Texas are some of the biggest racists in the nation who hate Obama.
Does that mean that Republicans are expected to embrace them as our own?
No more than you expect Muslims to embrace ISIS or Al Qaeda.
Well not so much, but a denunciation of those that murder over one's freedom of speech wouldn't hurt your cause.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Muslima wrote:I somehow missed this. What's even more infuriating is that he got released on bail and was advised to get psychiatric evaluations while many Muslims are currently being detained, sitting in jail indefinitely on conspiracy charges without bail. Yet, this guy is not being called a terrorist and not much discussion about the case anywhere
I believe the State Dept. has had an eye on this group for quite some time, due to terrorist ties back in Pakistan.
No justification for mass murder. Do you make this type of excuse in other attempted terrorism cases?