Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A rant.. I was speaking with someone who held her child back (red shirted K) because he has a March birthday. He's now is second grade and the mom is always complaining about how bored her son is in school. Well maybe if she sent her son to school on time, it wouldn't be an issue.
Signed a mom who has a son with a late August birthday who sent their child to school on time.
1) An advanced kid doesn't get held back.
2) Boredom in school doesn't signal gifted or talented behavior. Gifted and talented children do not get bored at school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A rant.. I was speaking with someone who held her child back (red shirted K) because he has a March birthday. He's now is second grade and the mom is always complaining about how bored her son is in school. Well maybe if she sent her son to school on time, it wouldn't be an issue.
Signed a mom who has a son with a late August birthday who sent their child to school on time.
1) An advanced kid doesn't get held back.
2) Boredom in school doesn't signal gifted or talented behavior. Gifted and talented children do not get bored at school.
Anonymous wrote:A rant.. I was speaking with someone who held her child back (red shirted K) because he has a March birthday. He's now is second grade and the mom is always complaining about how bored her son is in school. Well maybe if she sent her son to school on time, it wouldn't be an issue.
Signed a mom who has a son with a late August birthday who sent their child to school on time.
Anonymous wrote:"Focus on your own kid."
Yes, except to the extent that it affects the whole class when kids who are too old act out from boredom.
Anonymous wrote:A kid could be academically ready for K but held back for reasons kept private by the family. My son's pre-K class had a few kids who did not start K on time--one had been adopted as a toddler and had attachment issues and ADHD, another was socially and emotionally ready but was still in pullups due to some kind of intestinal problem (basically not potty trained yet), one had an end-of-September birthday and was just really "young" for his age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is part of the problem. You can elect to redshirt, but then you're stuck. Your kid, who had a temporary [whatever] that caused you to question his ability to handle kindergarten is now permanently dealing with being in an inappropriate grade. You can't now skip him up to the proper grade easily or in many cases at all.
If redshirting is no big deal, if parents deciding what their child ready for is something we absolutely support, then holding back and promoting forward should be something that can happen more than once, and with relative ease.
Yeah, that extra year of playtime at preschool doesn't always end well for the child. There is a boy in my daughter's class who is a year+ older and a full foot taller than the classmates.
I know someone who is red shirting her Sept 4th kid for literally no reason other than she doesn't want the kid to be the youngest in the class. This kid is the second and has always tried to keep up with the older sib, so is academically and socially very mature, but ALSO happens to be very tall (is as talk as my kid who is a year older). I cannot see how this won't be problematic; this kid is going to be bored in preschool next year and even more bored when they finally get to K and it's still only half day and will be full of kids who are much younger and smaller. Teachers have tried to convince the parent that the child is fully ready for K, child BEGS to go to K with pre-k friends and heyee not having it. Makes no sense to me, but it's not my circus and not my monkeys. I can see redshirting being valuable for kids who are socially or academically immature but not for the sole reason of wanting your kid to be very oldest in class vs very youngest.
My son has a September birthday and will be the oldest in his K class and most likely the tallest because the cutoff is September 1 where we live. I know that's not the same as redshirting but I sincerely hope other parents won't be talking about him this way. Focus on your own kid. The OP's example is extreme--I've never heard of a March birthday being redshirted. But it seems OP's problem is with the mother. Just stop hanging out with her if she is a complainer.
Anonymous wrote:"Focus on your own kid."
Yes, except to the extent that it affects the whole class when kids who are too old act out from boredom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is part of the problem. You can elect to redshirt, but then you're stuck. Your kid, who had a temporary [whatever] that caused you to question his ability to handle kindergarten is now permanently dealing with being in an inappropriate grade. You can't now skip him up to the proper grade easily or in many cases at all.
If redshirting is no big deal, if parents deciding what their child ready for is something we absolutely support, then holding back and promoting forward should be something that can happen more than once, and with relative ease.
Yeah, that extra year of playtime at preschool doesn't always end well for the child. There is a boy in my daughter's class who is a year+ older and a full foot taller than the classmates.
I know someone who is red shirting her Sept 4th kid for literally no reason other than she doesn't want the kid to be the youngest in the class. This kid is the second and has always tried to keep up with the older sib, so is academically and socially very mature, but ALSO happens to be very tall (is as talk as my kid who is a year older). I cannot see how this won't be problematic; this kid is going to be bored in preschool next year and even more bored when they finally get to K and it's still only half day and will be full of kids who are much younger and smaller. Teachers have tried to convince the parent that the child is fully ready for K, child BEGS to go to K with pre-k friends and heyee not having it. Makes no sense to me, but it's not my circus and not my monkeys. I can see redshirting being valuable for kids who are socially or academically immature but not for the sole reason of wanting your kid to be very oldest in class vs very youngest.